In Reply to: RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . posted by Amphissa on October 1, 2014 at 12:29:21:
The argument more specifically was that she has a unique take on all the music she plays and that she plays with such passion with little concern for wrong notes that we see her playing a lot of wrong notes. This is a common argument for the superiority of artists of the past over today's artists. These are traits that are commonly cited as the reasons why the artists of yesterday are superior to today's artists generally speaking. So what exactly is wrong with the argument? If you are going to question it then let's see the actual questions.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . - Analog Scott 12:45:55 10/01/14 (5)
- RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . - rbolaw 13:43:12 10/01/14 (4)
- RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . - Analog Scott 16:51:12 10/01/14 (3)
- RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . - David Smith 23:24:19 10/01/14 (1)
- RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . - Analog Scott 07:36:08 10/02/14 (0)
- RE: I think what Scott was saying. . . - rbolaw 17:30:32 10/01/14 (0)