In Reply to: RE: I see where you're coming from, but still. . . posted by rbolaw on September 16, 2014 at 12:31:52:
Nevertheless, actual examples might help us to understand exactly what you, Dave and Tony are getting at. To speak in broad generalities like this isn't the most helpful in getting the validity these assertions figured out. Also, I forgot what your own specific examples in the other thread were, so if you don't mind repeating. . .
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Your endless cries for "proof" are tiresome" - Chris from Lafayette 13:59:02 09/16/14 (6)
- No más. Sorry. nt - rbolaw 15:14:48 09/16/14 (5)
- It's OK - np [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 15:52:45 09/16/14 (4)
- Some suggested reading - rbolaw 06:12:30 09/17/14 (3)
- Excellent article - David Smith 15:31:39 09/17/14 (0)
- Very entertaining - Thanks! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 09:14:29 09/17/14 (0)
- RE: Some suggested reading - Analog Scott 07:34:47 09/17/14 (0)