In Reply to: RE: What's wrong with the eight others? posted by amioutaline? on September 13, 2014 at 05:02:58:
Szell's Beethoven I'd call "stiff".... And obscuring melodic line in favor of background details.... Somehow, the B-7 was totally devoid of that....
I recently posted comments of Szell's B-2, with those citations. But his "stiffness" is consistent throughout. His read of the B-9 is indistinguished... The contrast between the nuance of the light melodies and horrific darkness is blunted. Too "monotone" and "autopilot" for my tastes. The B-8 final movement, B-4 opening movement, B-4 final movement, B-3 third movement also show Szell's characteristic "stiffness". I think Szell may have had some conceptions of how Beethoven should sound like, which I disagree with. (Contrast to Dvorak, which I think he's absolute tops.)
If Szell was tolerable with other Beethoven symphonies, the First and Fifth.... The Fifth only because it is so interpretation-friendly. His B-1 is OK as well (the final movement saves him). (The Cleveland Orchestra was also the perfect type of orchestra for the B-1.) So I'll give you those. But I don't like Szell at all with any of the others.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What's wrong with the eight others? - Todd Krieger 01:31:38 09/14/14 (2)
- Wow, disagree at least in part. Haven't heard a better 3rd than Szell/Cleve. nt - Rick W 08:55:04 09/16/14 (0)
- So, tell us what you like - TGR 11:29:36 09/14/14 (0)