In Reply to: To a certain extent it's semantics posted by David Smith on September 6, 2014 at 10:34:48:
You stated that $10 for unlimited access to shitty 320Kbps MP3 (in Spotify's case, Ogg Vorbis) was too cheap to be sustainable.
I agreed and stated that in Europe some people pay more like $30-$40 for unlimited access to 16/44.1 Lossless FLAC.
Your claim is that NOBODY would pay twice to three times as much money to stream music at three times the bit depth as long as the crappy sounding cheap stuff is still on the market.
That's where we left it.
We'll have to wait and see.
First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- From your original post on the link below.... - Ivan303 10:52:12 09/06/14 (9)
- RE: From your original post on the link below.... - David Smith 11:05:10 09/06/14 (8)
- And yet of the FIVE differing plans offered by Spotify... - Ivan303 11:10:59 09/06/14 (7)
- RE: And yet of the FIVE differing plans offered by Spotify... - David Smith 11:21:00 09/06/14 (6)
- Actaully, the reason I started paying the $10/month. . . - Chris from Lafayette 13:57:29 09/06/14 (5)
- And you'd pay PLENTY more for Lossless FLAC... - Ivan303 14:44:16 09/06/14 (4)
- Looks as if Qobuz is going to have some competition in the CD-quality streaming wars - Chris from Lafayette 20:03:35 09/06/14 (3)
- Don't tell David Smith.... - Ivan303 20:33:49 09/06/14 (2)
- Yeah - I noticed the "deal" that US listeners will get compared to UK too [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 12:07:00 09/07/14 (1)
- Yeah, maybe QOBUZ will be cheaper once it comes to the US... - Ivan303 16:03:42 09/07/14 (0)