In Reply to: RE: Question posted by Chris from Lafayette on April 20, 2014 at 10:30:07:
Interesting excerpt; thanks for sharing. In the interest of thoroughness and balance (pun intended) it should be pointed out that doubling of individual orchestral parts, unless indicated in the score, can rightfully be considered taking excessive "artistic license" even if the effect is subjectively "better" as concerns dynamic balance. If, for instance, a fff string passage is drowning out the winds in, say, a Mahler symphony, an argument can be made for, instead of doubling the wind parts, to have the strings play less. I am not opposed to the idea in principle, but second guessing a composer's intentions is always a fine line to walk.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Question - frogman 17:26:44 04/20/14 (12)
- RE: Question - Amphissa 09:27:37 04/21/14 (6)
- RE: Question - frogman 10:35:47 04/21/14 (5)
- RE: Question - Amphissa 12:28:29 04/21/14 (2)
- RE: Question - frogman 18:21:10 04/21/14 (1)
- RE: Question - merlinus 19:37:35 04/21/14 (0)
- RE: Question - merlinus 11:26:11 04/21/14 (1)
- RE: Question - frogman 17:50:17 04/21/14 (0)
- RE: Question - Chris from Lafayette 00:00:19 04/21/14 (4)
- RE:"he only wrote that part in so that the player could "warm up" a bit before his solo a few measures later." - Ivan303 08:32:58 04/22/14 (0)
- RE: Question - frogman 05:48:33 04/21/14 (2)
- You too could have gotten OJ off! Nice, informative exchange, the both of yas. nt - tinear 08:18:45 04/22/14 (1)
- RE: You too could have gotten OJ off! Nice, informative exchange, the both of yas. nt - frogman 05:07:26 04/23/14 (0)