In Reply to: Great post, Mike! - I'd leave out your bullet No. 7 however posted by Chris from Lafayette on June 27, 2012 at 16:08:36:
Second the comment about great post...although I too can't agree with bullet 7....
I decided early this year to knuckle down and get to know Bruckner's 5th & 6th. The 5th I have known a long time - my first exposure to it was the Haitink recording distributed by the International Preview Society long ago - alas, I no longer have it. But I never really got to know it, not in the way I like to know works. The 6th was mostly unplowed territory for me. Earlier this year I bought the Blomstedt 6th that Chris mentions, and it is a terrific performance (although, yes, I don't really know the 6th, so how would I know....).
I also attended a performance by the SFSO with Blomstedt conducting the 5th....magnificent (especially given his age....and he conducted from memory!) - but I find the 6th to be the finer work. Lots of note spinning in the 5th, IMHO - music written by and for a music theory professor. :-). I think he might have performed the 6th a season ago - I am sorry I missed it. There are times when I believe Blomstedt to be a superior conductor to his successor in SF, MTT.
Anyway, I highly recommend Blomstedt's recording of the 6th, as Chris does - my only caveat is that is was recorded live, and there is a trace of audience noise, and worse, applause at the end, something that I am allergic to...but still a recommendable recording. I have heard that the 8th from these same sources is absolutely magnificent.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- More on Bruckner's 6th and Blomstedt - TGR 21:21:00 06/27/12 (3)
- RE: More on Bruckner's 6th and Blomstedt - Chris from Lafayette 22:15:43 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: More on Bruckner's 6th and Blomstedt - desertorganist 22:09:06 06/27/12 (1)
- RE: More on Bruckner's 6th and Blomstedt - rbolaw 13:21:48 06/28/12 (0)