Music Lane

Wow - thanks for the re-listen

98.248.68.220

In Reply to: RE: Went back for a second listen: I was a bit hasty posted by Nieustevea@msn.com on October 18, 2009 at 09:31:51

Even if you had stuck to your guns, that would still be OK with me. ("Suum cuique!"). :-)

Where I get confused though is when someone hears the exact same recording I've heard, and then describes the more factual elements of the performance 180 degrees opposite from the way I hear it. For instance, it would be as if someone claimed Martha Argerich's recording of the Rachmaninoff Third was slow and plodding! It's happened before (not with that recording, but with others).

Follow Ups:

RE: Wow - thanks for the re-listen - Nieustevea@msn.com 19:38:17 10/18/09 (1)
- No, sorry - I didn't mean your (revised) opinion. . . - Chris from Lafayette 20:12:58 10/18/09 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.