In Reply to: RE: Here's A More Direct Source posted by Todd A. on December 9, 2016 at 13:28:58:
Totally agree. When I hooked my MP3 player to the stereo around 1999-2000 encoded at "near CD quality 128kbps" I was sad because it was so flat, no imaging, and was absolutely awful.
At higher bitrates it's OK for casual "radio" listening, but I still prefer FM radio to it.
Can't wait for hi rez streaming to be available someday (MQA and/or 24/96)!!
====
"You are precisely as big as what you love and precisely as small as what you allow to annoy you." ~ R A Wilson
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Bromo33333 13:56:03 12/09/16 (18)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - JURB 09:49:58 12/10/16 (16)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Bromo33333 15:01:48 12/12/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - bwaslo 19:22:20 12/10/16 (14)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Dave_K 05:38:15 12/11/16 (12)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - JURB 15:22:28 12/11/16 (2)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Dave_K 08:36:53 12/13/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - JURB 15:32:57 12/11/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - bwaslo 10:19:34 12/11/16 (8)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Bromo33333 11:49:23 12/12/16 (6)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - bwaslo 12:17:41 12/12/16 (5)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Bromo33333 14:02:31 12/12/16 (4)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Bromo33333 14:56:33 12/12/16 (2)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - JURB 18:23:05 12/13/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Dave_K 08:11:37 12/13/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - bwaslo 14:17:28 12/12/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Dave_K 06:11:13 12/12/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - JURB 04:26:34 12/11/16 (0)
- RE: Here's A More Direct Source - Inmate51 08:35:55 12/10/16 (0)