RE: Hmmm.....

RE: Hmmm.....

Posted by Jonesy (A) on November 20, 2016 at 07:22:33

In Reply to: Hmmm..... posted by PAR on November 20, 2016 at 04:02:40:

I noticed that too. Reading the piece, watching the video and then a published journal article implies a vacuum will work best. So for now the vacuum tube is the inspiration and a nano vacuum the ultimate goal.

Cheers!

Jonesy

"I know just enough to get into trouble. But not enough to get out of it."

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - An end to Tube vs. Transistor debate on the horizon? - samoore 10:33:52 11/19/16 (15)

RE: An end to Tube vs. Transistor debate on the horizon? - michaelhigh 16:59:48 11/21/16 (0)

The vast majority of current audiophiles will be dead before this is mainstream.... nt - Smelly_Socks 13:07:35 11/21/16 (0)

RE: An end to Tube vs. Transistor debate on the horizon? - Tre' 10:32:23 11/21/16 (0)

Never... certainly not here... N/T - musetap 11:41:16 11/20/16 (0)

That would be a shame if true which it's probably not. Nt - geoffkait 11:08:52 11/20/16 (2)

Have a look at this. - Tre' 10:36:23 11/21/16 (1)

RE: Have a look at this. - geoffkait 04:33:42 11/23/16 (0)

Hmmm..... - PAR 04:02:40 11/20/16 (2)

RE: Hmmm..... - Jonesy 07:22:33 11/20/16 (1)

RE: Hmmm..... - PAR 09:53:56 11/20/16 (0)

RE: An end to Tube vs. Transistor debate on the horizon? - hahax@verizon.net 21:01:57 11/19/16 (1)

RE: An end to Tube vs. Transistor debate on the horizon? - Tweaker456 09:43:43 11/20/16 (0)

Nano-Tubes - jedrider 17:38:26 11/19/16 (0)

RE: An end to Tube vs. Transistor debate on the horizon? - ahendler 16:04:06 11/19/16 (0)

Cool. (nt) - mark111 10:47:23 11/19/16 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Hmmm..... - Jonesy 07:22:33 11/20/16 (1)

RE: Hmmm..... - PAR 09:53:56 11/20/16 (0)

Post a Message!