|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: CNBC trashes higher res streaming services posted by mcondo on August 6, 2016 at 05:13:31:
I have no problem with their findings. We audiophiles have a different set of criteria. We are critical listeners for detail, dimension, wide frequency response, imaging, etc. I personally listen to several internet radio stations on a regular basis. One is at 192. The other at 320kps. Both would be classified MP3 quality. I find both of them very enjoyable. If I listened using good headphones or in a critical mode I might not find them as pleasurable?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: CNBC trashes higher res streaming services - Mike B. 08:54:34 08/06/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
