|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Here is the original AES paper posted by Tony Lauck on January 19, 2016 at 11:52:18:
>>It should, as long as the writer of the code has paid the appropriate
>>license fee to MQA.
>
>There you have it. A tax on an in invention that will cost far more than
>the savings from sending a small number of bits over the internet. Absurd.
I really don't get your sense of entitlement, that you appear to believe
that you are entitled to use for free technology that a team of engineers
has spent years developing. Every time someone plays an MP3, the
Fraunhofer Institute has received 2 royalty fees, one for the encoded
file and one for the player. Every time someone plays a DVD, a host of
patent owners have each received a royalty for the video encoder and
another from the manufacturer of the player. Yet you complain that the
developers of MQA _shouldn't_ so benefit.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 04:02:59 01/20/16 (6)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 10:33:32 01/20/16 (5)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 11:02:12 01/20/16 (4)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - meisterkleef 11:39:32 01/20/16 (0)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 11:30:40 01/20/16 (2)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 12:26:04 01/20/16 (1)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 12:52:41 01/20/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
