In Reply to: MQA questions posted by tubby2 on January 16, 2016 at 12:53:44:
A few facts...
MQA is not Meridian, MQA is a separate company.
MQA is an end-to-end technology. The company claims that they correct for imperfections introduced by the A/D conversion process as well as the D/A conversion process. In order to accomplish this, they have created what I'd call profiles for specific A/D and D/A devices. The idea being, in my words, every A/D converter and DAC imparts its own imperfect sonic fingerprint, which MQA removes. This corrective process is obviously dependent on knowing the specific A/D and D/A device you are dealing with. The MQA proof of concept demos I heard at CES were done with MQA-enabled DACs.
"Authenticated" means a file has gone through the above scenario -- the encode process and decode process -- from end to end.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 16:41:01 01/16/16 (39)
- RE: " MQA is not Meridian, MQA is a separate company." - Ivan303 12:21:14 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: " MQA is not Meridian, MQA is a separate company." - Michael Lavorgna 12:23:31 01/17/16 (1)
- RE: "Again, so what? " - Ivan303 12:38:15 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - tubby2 10:19:05 01/17/16 (22)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 11:46:49 01/17/16 (16)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 11:58:28 01/17/16 (15)
- RE: "Calling me a shill, is not fine." -- Where? (nt) - goldenthal 14:58:47 01/17/16 (1)
- Down below here... - genungo 05:20:14 01/18/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 12:16:28 01/17/16 (12)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 12:21:01 01/17/16 (11)
- RE: MQA questions, opening quotation -- Again, where? (nt) - goldenthal 15:01:14 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 12:42:53 01/17/16 (9)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 12:51:25 01/17/16 (8)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:28:10 01/17/16 (7)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 13:37:36 01/17/16 (6)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:49:15 01/17/16 (5)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 14:31:36 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 13:48:30 01/18/16 (0)
- MQA is NOT a hoax... - Ivan303 14:53:17 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: MQA is NOT a hoax... - ahendler 15:15:20 01/17/16 (1)
- I have no idea... - Ivan303 16:46:07 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 10:45:25 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 13:34:23 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 13:52:06 01/18/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 13:48:28 01/17/16 (1)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 15:18:42 01/17/16 (0)
- Not Optimistic...... - Todd Krieger 00:22:04 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: Not Optimistic...... - Michael Lavorgna 08:46:55 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: "No advanced record/playback technology will get off the ground..." - genungo 02:50:37 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions - Isaak J. Garvey 17:08:23 01/16/16 (9)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 17:12:07 01/16/16 (8)
- RE: MQA questions - Isaak J. Garvey 17:14:12 01/16/16 (7)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 17:17:10 01/16/16 (6)
- RE: MQA questions - ahendler 21:21:43 01/16/16 (5)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 08:50:18 01/17/16 (4)
- RE: MQA questions - Tony Lauck 11:18:54 01/17/16 (3)
- RE: MQA questions - Michael Lavorgna 11:22:13 01/17/16 (2)
- RE: MQA questions - E-Stat 16:06:51 01/17/16 (0)
- RE: MQA questions -- Oh, I see now. Still, an overreaction? (nt) - goldenthal 15:12:08 01/17/16 (0)