RE: "observable L, C, R."

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - alan m. kafton 21:32:58 07/18/15 (78)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - b.l.zeebub 08:46:25 07/21/15 (6)

"observable L, C, R." - alan m. kafton 14:11:43 07/21/15 (5)

RE: "observable L, C, R." - Dave_K 16:34:41 07/21/15 (2)

RE: "observable L, C, R." - b.l.zeebub 02:31:05 07/22/15 (1)

Maybe this helps explain Governmentium? - Lakeshore Larry 04:38:38 07/22/15 (0)

RE: "observable L, C, R." - b.l.zeebub 14:24:07 07/21/15 (1)

We disagree....so be it. [nt] - alan m. kafton 14:29:11 07/21/15 (0)

When you get done gushing, - Jaundiced Ear 21:39:26 07/20/15 (3)

The Weyl Fermion was in the textbook - DrChaos 11:52:43 07/21/15 (0)

RE: "Worrying about the quantum level stuff" - genungo 05:21:28 07/21/15 (1)

Beautifullly stated....thank you. [nt] - alan m. kafton 14:04:10 07/21/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - briggs 14:36:36 07/20/15 (13)

You presume facts not in evidence, especially those concerning me. - alan m. kafton 14:53:01 07/20/15 (12)

RE: You presume facts not in evidence, especially those concerning me. - briggs 19:51:48 07/20/15 (11)

While we await Alan's response I offer an observation... - Steve O 21:25:30 07/20/15 (10)

RE: While we await Alan's response I offer an observation... - briggs 04:52:02 07/21/15 (0)

Co-opting real science? - alan m. kafton 01:35:36 07/21/15 (8)

RE: Co-opting real science? - DrChaos 11:50:29 07/21/15 (0)

RE: Co-opting real science? - jedrider 07:08:23 07/21/15 (6)

Achieving Audio Perfection - briggs 09:33:23 07/21/15 (0)

"Our understanding of brain science is also being revolutionized. "... - Steve O 08:20:56 07/21/15 (4)

RE: "Our understanding of brain science is also being revolutionized. "... - mkuller 12:07:55 07/21/15 (2)

Faith that one's observations represent a universal reality (nt) - Steve O 13:28:32 07/21/15 (1)

RE: Faith that one's observations represent a universal reality (nt) - mkuller 13:38:56 07/21/15 (0)

RE: "Our understanding of brain science is also being revolutionized. "... - jedrider 12:00:53 07/21/15 (0)

Now you've done it... - mkuller 13:43:20 07/20/15 (2)

RE: Now you've done it... - alan m. kafton 14:07:00 07/20/15 (1)

If it works... - musetap 10:16:42 07/21/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - rick_m 10:21:56 07/20/15 (0)

No proof is needed - rlindsa 09:52:27 07/20/15 (0)

Putting the cart in front of the horse I see - 3db 09:36:23 07/20/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - daleda 06:54:35 07/20/15 (2)

Has anyone here tried feng shui? nt - briggs 07:15:05 07/20/15 (1)

We utilize the - LWR 07:37:04 07/20/15 (0)

I Caution Audiophiles... - Doug Schroeder 05:25:07 07/20/15 (6)

Thankyou. Very well said (nt) - 3db 09:32:24 07/20/15 (0)

RE: 'Quantum products" - genungo 05:58:38 07/20/15 (2)

Yes, I Have... - Doug Schroeder 06:40:37 07/20/15 (1)

RE: Yes, I Have... - briggs 12:18:17 07/20/15 (0)

Doug....you have completely missed all the relevant points. [nt] - alan m. kafton 05:50:12 07/20/15 (1)

It seems to me that Doug is right on target. - briggs 07:18:00 07/20/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - jedrider 22:24:32 07/19/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - davidandcandy@gmail.com 17:42:35 07/19/15 (1)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - alan m. kafton 17:48:13 07/19/15 (0)

Cool link thanks! Nt - hawkmoon 17:15:10 07/19/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - Pat D 16:13:00 07/19/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - fantja 14:18:51 07/19/15 (0)

And to think some audiophiles actually wonder how they've become a laughing stock - J.Mac 14:11:32 07/19/15 (0)

Is this possibly the Higgs boson's mate? - briggs 13:57:13 07/19/15 (1)

RE: Is this possibly the Higgs boson's mate? - alan m. kafton 17:48:56 07/19/15 (0)

Do you trot that out on every announcement of new particle(s). - bjh 12:15:49 07/19/15 (0)

RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... - unclestu 11:00:24 07/19/15 (7)

I don't argue against quantum effects, but I for one ... - Feanor 12:09:07 07/19/15 (6)

RE: I don't argue against quantum effects, but I for one ... - 91derlust 19:34:41 07/19/15 (5)

Hypotheticals are not evidence - Jaundiced Ear 21:16:32 07/20/15 (2)

RE: Hypotheticals are not evidence - 91derlust 01:17:27 07/21/15 (1)

Hopefully this clarifies the point and minimises any confusion. - Jaundiced Ear 01:23:41 07/21/15 (0)

Great questions....nicely stated as well. [nt] - alan m. kafton 21:36:45 07/19/15 (1)

Thanks - it is something I wrestle with... - 91derlust 03:51:22 07/20/15 (0)

Get back to us when you prove how Weyl fermions improve cables -nt - Feanor 10:59:49 07/19/15 (3)

... Until then it's all just snake oil -nt - Feanor 11:00:50 07/19/15 (2)

Thank you for (easily) proving my point. [nt] - alan m. kafton 12:27:09 07/19/15 (1)

RE: Thank you for (easily) proving my point. [nt] - David Pritchard 12:53:17 07/19/15 (0)

to some, if it isn't in a textbook, it doesn't exist - Awe-d-o-file 07:35:57 07/19/15 (10)

RE: to some, if it isn't in a textbook, it doesn't exist - 91derlust 19:26:19 07/19/15 (0)

RE: to some, if it isn't in a textbook, it doesn't exist - SgreenP@MSN.com 11:33:04 07/19/15 (1)

RE: to some, if it isn't in a textbook, it doesn't exist - Awe-d-o-file 13:58:51 07/19/15 (0)

PS Audio - unclestu 10:57:06 07/19/15 (0)

I, for one, await the unveiling of very first quantum placebo - genungo 08:17:11 07/19/15 (5)

out of context - Awe-d-o-file 08:55:17 07/19/15 (3)

Yes, I realize that - genungo 09:05:53 07/19/15 (2)

You started talking about tweaks in general - Awe-d-o-file 14:01:05 07/19/15 (1)

RE: tweaks in general - genungo 16:17:03 07/19/15 (0)

ROTFLMAO!! - Mike K 08:38:46 07/19/15 (0)

Do you suppose they could find Weyl fermions in beeswax? nt - briggs 04:26:17 07/19/15 (1)

RE: Do you suppose they could find Weyl fermions in beeswax? - genungo 04:42:50 07/19/15 (0)

Wow! So that explains cable burn in! I see the light! Nt - kuribo 22:40:54 07/18/15 (1)

Someday it might....let's hope so. [nt] - alan m. kafton 12:24:30 07/19/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: "observable L, C, R." - b.l.zeebub 14:24:07 07/21/15 (1)

We disagree....so be it. [nt] - alan m. kafton 14:29:11 07/21/15 (0)

Post a Message!