In Reply to: RE: You presume facts not in evidence, especially those concerning me. posted by briggs on July 20, 2015 at 19:51:48:
...Alan's original post is yet another attack on perfectionist audio naysayers (objectivists). Since the "discovery" of the Weyl fermion will most likely have no direct effect on the pursuit of perfectionist audio for the foreseeable future, his citation of it seems to be both a red herring and allegorical. The real intention of the post appears to be an attempt at increasing the legitimacy of the subjective and fringe aspects of perfectionist audio.
Personally I find attempts such as this to co opt real science into support for fringe audio concepts clumsy and unconvincing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- While we await Alan's response I offer an observation... - Steve O 21:25:30 07/20/15 (10)
- RE: While we await Alan's response I offer an observation... - briggs 04:52:02 07/21/15 (0)
- Co-opting real science? - alan m. kafton 01:35:36 07/21/15 (8)
- RE: Co-opting real science? - DrChaos 11:50:29 07/21/15 (0)
- RE: Co-opting real science? - jedrider 07:08:23 07/21/15 (6)
- Achieving Audio Perfection - briggs 09:33:23 07/21/15 (0)
- "Our understanding of brain science is also being revolutionized. "... - Steve O 08:20:56 07/21/15 (4)
- RE: "Our understanding of brain science is also being revolutionized. "... - mkuller 12:07:55 07/21/15 (2)
- Faith that one's observations represent a universal reality (nt) - Steve O 13:28:32 07/21/15 (1)
- RE: Faith that one's observations represent a universal reality (nt) - mkuller 13:38:56 07/21/15 (0)
- RE: "Our understanding of brain science is also being revolutionized. "... - jedrider 12:00:53 07/21/15 (0)