In Reply to: Ideal frequency response curve posted by throwback on June 16, 2015 at 06:03:35:
"Yet a measured flat response at the upper end of the spectrum might sound subjectively way too bright and a measured flat response at the low end might sound subjectively too anemic. And I'm not talking about problems of calibration with the meter itself."
If this is the case, I believe there is some sort of distortion(s) in the signal (chain) causing the perceived brightness, not the FR itself.....
"I'd love to resurrect this topic, especially since digital correction is such a hot item right now."
Digital correction IMO causes more problems than it solves.......
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Todd Krieger 12:59:54 06/16/15 (15)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - hahax@verizon.net 19:36:19 06/16/15 (13)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - hahax@verizon.net 20:55:18 06/17/15 (0)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Todd Krieger 09:24:31 06/17/15 (0)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Tony Lauck 07:46:45 06/17/15 (10)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Todd Krieger 09:47:28 06/17/15 (1)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Tony Lauck 14:47:45 06/17/15 (0)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Inmate51 08:14:55 06/17/15 (7)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Tony Lauck 14:34:10 06/17/15 (5)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - DrChaos 10:33:15 06/18/15 (4)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Tony Lauck 12:49:45 06/18/15 (3)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - throwback 05:50:05 06/19/15 (2)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - Tony Lauck 06:55:21 06/19/15 (1)
- RE: The banning of instruments - genungo 07:55:05 06/19/15 (0)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - davidandcandy@gmail.com 13:02:07 06/17/15 (0)
- RE: Ideal frequency response curve - DrChaos 14:28:57 06/16/15 (0)