Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

RE: Total disconnect between price and quality

IMHO Class D was meant to be cheap....


Class D was meant to be efficient.

I think it takes more engineering expertise and effort to design a Class D circuit than a Class A/AB circuit, which is why the Class D market is dominanted by a handful of OEMs who supply modules and chips to everyone else. I don't know enough to say whether power supply design is any more or less critical to Class D performance, but I don't see any reason to assume that it's less critical. Similarly, it's not obvious that part selection is any less critical or that part cost should be cheaper. It would be interesting to compare the parts cost for the amplifier section of a $10k Class A or AB amp with the cost of one of the better Class D modules. Thermal design is more challenging for Class A than AB than D, which drives Class D to be cheaper at high power levels. But at low to moderate power levels, if anything I would expect Class D to be more expensive than Class A/AB for equivalent performance.

It seems like you're presuming that most of the cost of an audio amplifier is in the amplification circuit, and therefore Class D should be cheaper due to the availability of OEM amplification modules. To me that's like saying all DACs should be cheap because they all use off the shelf DAC chips.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  The Cable Cooker  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.