In Reply to: I'm An Audiophile and I Won't Apologize for It posted by vaudioville on February 20, 2015 at 18:58:26:
The root problem comes from two different angles....
One is the lack of comprehension or appreciation amongst the masses of how live music sounds, so anyone's quest to reproduce it does not compute with these people. Although these people have existed in the past, they exist today in far greater proportions. Because the exposure to good live music and good audio systems in recent time has not been nearly as widespread. (The media spoonfeeding the masses prefab acts like Lady Gaga and the Blackeyed Peas doesn't help either.)
The second is the "inferiority complex" amongst those who seem unable to pick up what audiophiles notice, from a sonic standpoint. And they are somehow "offended" over the notion that their perceptions might be "inferior" to those of audiophiles. Often calling them "golden ears", "crackpots", or "luddites" in the process. Not realizing it's not "hearing ability" that separates them from audiophiles, but the lack of training of what to listen for. (The author of the article touched on that.)
The sad part about "audiophile ridicule" is that it's mostly ego driven, not really an interest to advance the art. And it ultimately hinders the art. For I do think the disdain for audiophile feedback has taken audio design on a path of compromise and gimmicks, rather than pushing it to greater heights. (This is a major contrast to the advancement of video technology, where such compromise has NOT taken place.)
Although I've never taken this "ridicule" personally, it bothers me that the it too often seems to be shallow excuses by designers to cut corners and compromise performance.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I'm An Audiophile and I Won't Apologize for It - Todd Krieger 00:42:39 02/21/15 (37)
- RE: I'm An Audiophile and I Won't Apologize for It - regmac 12:53:04 02/21/15 (1)
- RE: I'm An Audiophile and I Won't Apologize for It - Todd Krieger 16:26:28 02/21/15 (0)
- +1 - E-Stat 06:56:40 02/21/15 (34)
- RE: +1 - Pat D 09:14:16 02/21/15 (33)
- RE: +1 - Todd Krieger 16:37:41 02/21/15 (0)
- RE: +1 - regmac 13:45:08 02/21/15 (5)
- RE: +1 - Todd Krieger 16:41:12 02/21/15 (3)
- RE: +1 - regmac 12:48:47 02/22/15 (1)
- Objective proof... - mkuller 20:35:11 02/22/15 (0)
- RE: +1 - Pat D 16:56:38 02/21/15 (0)
- RE: +1 - bjh 14:48:07 02/21/15 (0)
- LOL! - mkuller 10:13:23 02/21/15 (9)
- But wait...here's an objective test for you... - mkuller 12:07:17 02/21/15 (8)
- RE: But wait...here's an objective test for you... - Pat D 12:35:44 02/21/15 (7)
- RE: But wait...here's an objective test for you... - mkuller 12:38:24 02/21/15 (6)
- so how equipment looks does make a difference to how it sounds?? come on. - Tom Schuman 05:47:17 02/24/15 (1)
- First of all... - mkuller 11:01:55 02/24/15 (0)
- RE: But wait...here's an objective test for you... - Tre' 17:20:37 02/21/15 (0)
- RE: But wait...here's an objective test for you... - Pat D 13:01:52 02/21/15 (0)
- RE: But wait...here's an objective test for you... - A.Wayne 12:46:46 02/21/15 (1)
- Let's hope it doesn't really have all that wow. - Dave Pogue 16:31:35 02/21/15 (0)
- *yawn* - Todd A. 09:50:16 02/21/15 (0)
- Here's Mr. Teflon again! - E-Stat 09:45:17 02/21/15 (14)
- Mr. Equivocation again. - Pat D 16:10:26 02/22/15 (13)
- Answers - E-Stat 16:29:55 02/22/15 (12)
- RE: Answers - Pat D 18:49:50 02/22/15 (11)
- RE: Answers - E-Stat 06:15:17 02/23/15 (10)
- RE: Answers - Pat D 10:15:04 02/23/15 (9)
- More answers - E-Stat 13:09:26 02/23/15 (8)
- RE: More answers - Pat D 17:51:32 02/27/15 (1)
- RE: More answers - E-Stat 06:58:50 02/28/15 (0)
- RE: Why Halcro...? - A.Wayne 13:55:56 02/23/15 (5)
- RE: Why Halcro...? - E-Stat 14:06:31 02/23/15 (4)
- RE: Why Halcro...? - A.Wayne 14:32:21 02/23/15 (3)
- RE: Why Halcro...? - E-Stat 14:40:41 02/23/15 (2)
- RE: Why Halcro...? - A.Wayne 15:10:39 02/23/15 (1)
- RE: Why Halcro...? - E-Stat 15:17:01 02/23/15 (0)