In Reply to: How is it "prejudiced"? posted by rlindsa on January 26, 2015 at 08:28:53:
Rlindsa,
i don't how you're counting number of postings - whether in response to an original posting or not; i think that matters as they are two differing styles of nature (so to speak).
next, to align (?) me with mr. sudz is pretty stupid and probably stems from my *support* of his (right to) post. as i've said many times - not that it matters with english-langauge speakers and/or this A.A. board - if someone were to post the exact same posting as sudz (or maybe now me), you would never hear cries of troll or attention-getting or other denigrating reactions.
next, i'm very familiar with what prejudice means aside from the americanized meaning of ethnic groups and stereotyping them (obviously i'm not referring to that singular look at the meaning). prejudice as in pre-formed and pre-judgements - this is shown by my above observation (the same exact posting of a sudz or me under another moniker will not get the same negative down-look reaction).
last, it's also a prejudice (which I answered at least two times) that one is prejudiced against BY NOT GIVING HIS/HER OWN ANSWER when posting an original posting. i already answered why this should not be necessary (see what i wrote under my posting about what component sounds more or less the same to you - directly under it, i gave my own answer).
roger wang
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- several faulty premises..... - wangmr 08:52:31 01/26/15 (0)