In Reply to: RE: Cables Asylum posted by fantja on January 21, 2015 at 04:12:32:
In any cable discussion it is desirable to exclude allowing that in a cable area. Since the naysayers just never know when to quit.
They are on a MISSION, and they think they have to spread the word..
Since they really believe the drivel they spout, they think they are 'saving' people from folly..
Where in fact they are just insane maniacs.
Anyone who has been around other sites can know exactly what I mean.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The problems with folks ranting on about DBT and all calbes sound the same rants - Nuit 16:38:18 01/21/15 (79)
- RE: The problems with folks ranting on about DBT and all calbes sound the same rants - Todd Krieger 00:57:30 01/24/15 (0)
- Isn't it amazing how much virtual ink is spilled - E-Stat 07:00:52 01/23/15 (0)
- Have you considered the case where you take what you wrote... - Steve O 18:40:54 01/21/15 (76)
- I'm not sure if you noticed the slight difference: - carcass93 19:00:04 01/21/15 (75)
- RE: I'm not sure if you noticed the slight difference: - pictureguy 20:06:13 01/22/15 (0)
- RE: I'm not sure if you noticed the slight difference: - josh358 13:10:26 01/22/15 (12)
- Ahh... "cables as tone controls" argument. - carcass93 13:38:57 01/22/15 (11)
- RE: Ahh... "cables as tone controls" argument. - josh358 18:10:43 01/22/15 (10)
- RE: Ahh... "cables as tone controls" argument. - Sordidman 19:14:26 01/22/15 (9)
- RE: Ahh... "cables as tone controls" argument. - josh358 19:29:19 01/22/15 (8)
- You're talking about the act of listening, and experiences - Sordidman 19:51:32 01/22/15 (7)
- RE: You're talking about the act of listening, and experiences - josh358 07:31:34 01/23/15 (6)
- Nicely put!... - Steve O 13:08:28 01/23/15 (1)
- RE: Nicely put!... - josh358 19:40:54 01/25/15 (0)
- I mostly agree with what you wrote: FWIW, and... - Sordidman 10:21:19 01/23/15 (1)
- RE: I mostly agree with what you wrote: FWIW, and... - josh358 12:38:23 01/23/15 (0)
- Confirmation bias, and maybe another thing too.. - genungo 08:55:16 01/23/15 (1)
- RE: Confirmation bias, and maybe another thing too.. - josh358 09:42:13 01/23/15 (0)
- "Believe" is most definitely an appropriate term... - Steve O 21:47:13 01/21/15 (60)
- Perhaps you should consult a dictionary? -t - Sordidman 09:44:16 01/22/15 (52)
- Perhaps I did... - Steve O 10:56:48 01/22/15 (51)
- Scientific, observational testing is not belief - Sordidman 11:29:50 01/22/15 (50)
- Same tired arguments... - Steve O 12:55:20 01/22/15 (49)
- trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something. - Sordidman 13:36:35 01/22/15 (9)
- RE: trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something. - Steve O 16:11:18 01/22/15 (8)
- RE: trust, faith, or confidence in someone or something. - Sordidman 17:38:39 01/22/15 (7)
- And what about those that have extensive experience and claim cables don't matter? - kuribo 06:11:43 01/23/15 (6)
- RE: And what about those that have extensive experience and claim cables don't matter? - Sordidman 09:23:59 01/23/15 (5)
- Here's a start.... - kuribo 16:13:11 01/23/15 (4)
- I predict... - Steve O 20:21:53 01/23/15 (3)
- See - you DO get it. But it's all irrelevant anyway. - carcass93 09:11:27 01/24/15 (1)
- And you get it too! (nt) - Steve O 10:41:43 01/24/15 (0)
- But of course....nt - kuribo 21:08:00 01/23/15 (0)
- "Same tired arguments"? Does that mean that you consider yours exploring some new terrains? - carcass93 13:06:25 01/22/15 (38)
- Hey, you can believe in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny and that's fine but... - Markw* 13:26:10 01/22/15 (37)
- Convince? "Discerning masses" (that's hilarious, BTW)? No intention whatsoever. N/T - carcass93 13:32:53 01/22/15 (36)
- Perhaps "skeptical" would have been more appropriate? - Markw* 13:45:57 01/22/15 (35)
- Observational application of the scientific method - Sordidman 15:32:02 01/22/15 (34)
- Face it, that's just your way of saying it's an opinion that cannot be proven scientifically? - Markw* 16:34:47 01/22/15 (26)
- No, it's your minority viewpoint of denigrating scientific discovery - Sordidman 16:41:36 01/22/15 (25)
- So, you'r esaying it's a proven fact? - Markw* 16:54:35 01/22/15 (24)
- You know Elvis? You must be a faith guy..... - Sordidman 17:43:58 01/22/15 (23)
- "I hear it" doesn't constitute proof. - Markw* 01:26:41 01/23/15 (22)
- Actually, - along with measurements, and physical differences - Sordidman 09:35:18 01/23/15 (3)
- Just because you claim to hear something doesn't make it real. - Markw* 10:15:43 01/23/15 (2)
- Oh yes it does: further, it is beyond pompous to claim that - Sordidman 10:42:08 01/23/15 (1)
- Been there, done that. - Markw* 13:55:32 01/23/15 (0)
- RE: "I hear it" doesn't constitute proof. - Dave_K 06:41:40 01/23/15 (17)
- FWIW: Agree with all that you said -t - Sordidman 09:37:59 01/23/15 (0)
- RE: "I hear it" doesn't constitute proof. - Markw* 07:25:37 01/23/15 (15)
- The intolerant dogma preacher accusing others of dogma - Sordidman 09:39:28 01/23/15 (8)
- Hey, you're free to believe what you want to believe. - Markw* 10:13:31 01/23/15 (7)
- You're the dictator, telling everyone that they can't hear - Sordidman 10:46:52 01/23/15 (6)
- No, you're the one telling them what they should hear. - Markw* 13:53:08 01/23/15 (5)
- Cite it, - copy & paste where I said it... Prove it!! LULZ -t - Sordidman 15:29:32 01/23/15 (4)
- Seems you can win $1million by proving you can discern a difference- contact James Randi...go for it! nt - kuribo 16:14:44 01/23/15 (1)
- C'mon boys: let's get together for a listening Par-Tay -t - Sordidman 16:38:35 01/23/15 (0)
- I'm a BIG believer in power cables NOW!....... - audiophile919 15:53:18 01/23/15 (1)
- Well then more power to ya. - Markw* 17:21:43 01/23/15 (0)
- Does "I see it" constitute proof? - genungo 09:36:12 01/23/15 (5)
- As many illusionists have proven, that's not necessarily so. - Markw* 10:11:48 01/23/15 (3)
- RE: As many illusionists have proven - genungo 10:59:47 01/23/15 (1)
- "How many illusionists do you think there are, lurking in the shadows waiting to fool us?" - Markw* 17:23:35 01/23/15 (0)
- "any many people hear things that aren't so" - Sordidman 10:48:58 01/23/15 (0)
- Exactly right...... - Sordidman 09:44:57 01/23/15 (0)
- RE: Observational application of the scientific method - Steve O 16:20:07 01/22/15 (6)
- Listen to a system in context with several different cables in place: easy -t - Sordidman 16:43:32 01/22/15 (5)
- Does that answer my question?... - Steve O 17:31:47 01/22/15 (4)
- Yes: very well thank you. While you're looking things up - Sordidman 17:47:57 01/22/15 (3)
- Before embarking on a journey of personal discovery... - Steve O 18:06:41 01/22/15 (2)
- Not! and especially not an either/or dichotomy - Sordidman 18:51:39 01/22/15 (1)
- RE: Not! and especially not an either/or dichotomy - Sprezza Tura 18:54:35 01/22/15 (0)
- RE: "Believe" is most definitely an appropriate term... - rick_m 22:39:27 01/21/15 (6)
- RE: "Believe" is most definitely an appropriate term... - geoffkait 04:44:50 01/22/15 (5)
- You've got a Bose Wave CD too? Cool! (nt) - Steve O 08:23:49 01/22/15 (3)
- Would you believe I have a Bose Walkman CD Player? Would you believe it sounds good? I'm not hot doggin ya. - geoffkait 10:14:29 01/22/15 (2)
- Now you get to tell people what they can, and can't hear :-) -t - Sordidman 17:49:20 01/22/15 (1)
- Hmmmm, I guess that's true. ;-). Nt - geoffkait 04:15:39 01/23/15 (0)
- RE: "Believe" is most definitely an appropriate term... - rick_m 06:54:53 01/22/15 (0)