In Reply to: So, there's no such thing as a crappy sounding recording? posted by genungo on December 9, 2014 at 17:22:55:
I'm not really in the mood for a rerun - especially when it's such an obvious and simple topic. Recordings don't have a sound. How a recording sounds is dependent on the system it is being played on.
No doubt the better a system the better we can judge recording quality but there's no reason to assume a correlation between that quality and good/bad sound.
A good recording can sound really bad - think bag pipes or people who aren't up to the sound they are attempting to sing. No doubt for me a low quality recording of great music will sound much better than a high quality recording a bad music - given a musically capable stereo not one that emphasizes attributes of the recording process.
IME bad sound usually indicates a stereo unable to properly deal with a recording.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: So, there's no such thing as a crappy sounding recording? - Goober58 12:32:03 12/11/14 (10)
- RE: "Recordings don't have a sound" - genungo 17:09:16 12/11/14 (9)
- How can a bad system make a bad recording sound better? - Goober58 18:22:38 12/11/14 (8)
- No, you can't have it both ways... - genungo 19:09:34 12/11/14 (7)
- one more thing - Goober58 22:50:01 12/11/14 (6)
- RE: one more thing - genungo 03:27:14 12/12/14 (5)
- RE: one more thing - Goober58 09:59:13 12/12/14 (4)
- RE: one more thing - genungo 10:11:20 12/12/14 (3)
- Sorry - Goober58 12:30:27 12/12/14 (2)
- Don't rock the boat, baby - genungo 13:06:03 12/12/14 (1)
- LOL! - Inmate51 14:40:33 12/12/14 (0)