In Reply to: RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson posted by Pat D on November 13, 2014 at 09:21:29:
FWIW, I agree with your opinion of the man. He wrote some very nice, flowery prose. But he was among the most subjective of reviewers, and that is a strike against him in my book.
And thanks for that 50 cent word (panegyrical) in your post! I haven't had to do a lookup in a long time!!
-RW-
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well, the denizens here have certainly excoriated you... - rlw 11:53:30 11/14/14 (0)