Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"...

You seem to think it's an 'either-or' rather than a 'both' methodology. Actually, I do want a reviewer to be able to give a good idea of how the equipment performs, and this goes for speakers, too. Sorry if that offends some. Harry Pearson could not do this. With Stereophile, often the reviewers and the measurers are not the same people

But I really don't need a reviewer to tell me how equipment sounds, as I can determine that for myself by listening to it. That includes auditioning at home with return privileges. Isn't that what audiophiles recommend?

I would never buy a speaker without auditioning it extensively.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Pat D 10:20:52 11/14/14 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.