In Reply to: An interesting read posted by middleground on November 13, 2014 at 11:38:07:
Reading it as I did was painful. It is filled with half-truths, over-generalizations, and "straw man" arguments. It focuses on two audio magazines as though they were peer-reviewed publications that represent the universe of audio. The author mis-understands complaints regarding early commercial digital reproduction in the home. The text is more suitable to a magazine article by a biased (or innocently misguided) author than a scholarly effort at discovering and revealing some aspect of our existence that was unknown previously. Due to the magnitude of its errors and unsupported conclusions it belongs in my opinion in the trash heap without regard to its accidental incidences of truth.Cheers,
Ian
Edits: 11/13/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- If you have not read it, why pass it on? - lochrider 16:34:26 11/13/14 (1)
- RE: If you have not read it, why pass it on? - middleground 04:22:37 11/14/14 (0)