In Reply to: Just glanced at conclusion posted by E-Stat on November 13, 2014 at 11:55:51:
The paper makes no attempt at all to find out or discover anything. The paper begins by presenting her opinions as fact, after which it proceeds to attempt to back those opinions up with a mountain of irrelevant data. End result is a big fat load of nothing. For God's sake, even the title is a mess, full of snide insinuations. And exactly what the hell is "Anti-Mass Sentiment"? Sounds like somthing that's mucking up the Warp Drive.
Edits: 11/13/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The "conclusion" is in the first paragraph - vinyl phanatic 16:00:17 11/13/14 (5)
- RE: The "conclusion" is in the first paragraph - Pat D 19:38:49 11/14/14 (0)
- "Anti-Mass Sentiment"... - kuma 16:34:41 11/13/14 (2)
- I thought it was an anti-Catholic screed... - rlw 11:18:24 11/15/14 (0)
- Honestly, at first glance, I thought that's what she was talking about! nt - vinyl phanatic 18:40:06 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: The "conclusion" is in the first paragraph - E-Stat 16:08:32 11/13/14 (0)