General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: "...and Quad 57s." posted by Ivan303 on November 13, 2014 at 10:02:28:
Perhaps Quad II's?
Proudly serving content-free posts since 1984.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - New York Times on Harry Pearson - Peter Breuninger 05:14:27 11/13/14 (68)
- RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - fantja 10:41:14 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Pat D 09:21:29 11/13/14 (42)
- Well, the denizens here have certainly excoriated you... - rlw 11:53:30 11/14/14 (0)
- "We know speakers sound different"? Actually, "we" know - from experience - much more than that. - carcass93 08:58:21 11/14/14 (1)
- +1 nt - Tony Lauck 11:41:29 11/14/14 (0)
- Your - kavakidd 23:19:27 11/13/14 (2)
- We are SO LUCKY that he wasn't OVER-QUALIFIED for the job - jedrider 11:16:19 11/13/14 (0)
- It appears you found... - mkuller 10:54:53 11/13/14 (5)
- RE: It appears you found... - Pat D 11:12:10 11/14/14 (3)
- RE: It appears you found... - mkuller 12:04:56 11/14/14 (2)
- RE: It appears you found... - Pat D 20:21:54 11/14/14 (1)
- RE: It appears you found... - mkuller 21:44:26 11/14/14 (0)
- RE: It appears you found... - middleground 11:08:07 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Ozzy 09:53:50 11/13/14 (2)
- RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Pat D 11:44:52 11/14/14 (1)
- "...the accurate ones"? - mkuller 21:51:35 11/14/14 (0)
- RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - tesla 09:43:53 11/13/14 (18)
- If you'd like to revisit that review - E-Stat 14:54:06 11/13/14 (1)
- Under HP's influence . . . - M3 lover 17:29:48 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - mkuller 09:53:17 11/13/14 (15)
- "...in 1976, what was better than stacked Advents?" - rlw 12:55:55 11/14/14 (2)
- RE: "...in 1976, what was better than stacked Advents?" - seas 09:48:16 11/15/14 (0)
- RE: "...in 1976, what was better than stacked Advents?" - Pat D 20:28:03 11/14/14 (0)
- Don't forget - Des 15:16:15 11/13/14 (0)
- If you return to Issue 1 - E-Stat 10:11:47 11/13/14 (7)
- RE: If you return to Issue 1 - mkuller 10:42:35 11/13/14 (6)
- Actually... - E-Stat 11:08:32 11/13/14 (5)
- I'm sure I wouldn't want anyone here to know what I was listening to.... - Ivan303 12:12:06 11/13/14 (4)
- Why not? - E-Stat 12:45:34 11/13/14 (3)
- That's a darn good system, homes! - rlw 13:07:30 11/14/14 (0)
- OK, mid 60's I wasn't doing too bad.. - Ivan303 13:18:33 11/13/14 (1)
- RE: OK, mid 60's I wasn't doing too bad.. - E-Stat 13:45:06 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: "...and Quad 57s." - Ivan303 10:02:28 11/13/14 (2)
- RE: "...and Quad 57s." - tesla 10:05:01 11/13/14 (1)
- First heard a pair at a guys house... - Ivan303 12:20:14 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Ivan303 09:31:05 11/13/14 (6)
- Does Michael Schumacher - E-Stat 09:55:38 11/13/14 (3)
- RE: Does Michael Schumacher - middleground 10:34:53 11/13/14 (2)
- RE: Does Michael Schumacher - bjh 11:12:55 11/13/14 (1)
- Neil Armstrong taught my dad calculus... - rlw 13:15:30 11/14/14 (0)
- RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Ozzy 09:55:08 11/13/14 (1)
- RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Pat D 10:20:52 11/14/14 (0)
- Gotta admit, the New York Times is still the benchmark for how a paper is written. - David S. 09:00:18 11/13/14 (20)
- RE: Really?.... - wangmr 23:00:37 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: Gotta admit, the New York Times is still the benchmark for how a paper is written. - middleground 10:37:44 11/13/14 (1)
- I may not agree with ALL of HP's ideas, but think the obit was well done. - David S. 10:45:49 11/14/14 (0)
- NYT not nearly as good as WSJ - Mike K 09:45:14 11/13/14 (15)
- Rubbish! - rlw 13:20:14 11/14/14 (0)
- I was thinking that LATimes is pretty good - jedrider 10:31:59 11/13/14 (1)
- You need to train that dog to use the out of doors for relief! * - Mike K 17:24:53 11/13/14 (0)
- RE: NYT not nearly as good as WSJ - mkuller 09:50:10 11/13/14 (11)
- RE: NYT not nearly as good as WSJ - fin1bxn@msn.com 08:35:52 11/14/14 (1)
- Good at what? - mkuller 10:44:19 11/14/14 (0)
- "WSJ is Fox News in print" - Ozzy 07:10:35 11/14/14 (5)
- Are you serious?! - rlw 13:22:34 11/14/14 (4)
- RE: Are you serious?! - Ozzy 16:14:49 11/14/14 (3)
- RE: Are you serious?! - mkuller 18:25:26 11/14/14 (2)
- RE: Are you serious?! - Ozzy 03:42:20 11/15/14 (1)
- Yes! - mkuller 09:26:42 11/15/14 (0)
- Standard of what??! - kavakidd 23:27:10 11/13/14 (1)
- RE: Standard of what??! - mkuller 08:13:27 11/14/14 (0)
- +1 - Sondek 12:11:33 11/13/14 (0)
- I was thinking the same thing. Very classy (nt) - 4everyoung 09:17:52 11/13/14 (0)
- Very nice...(nt) - mkuller 08:13:04 11/13/14 (0)
- I agree - Brian Walsh 06:11:41 11/13/14 (0)
- That and Michael Fremer's wonderful posting in Analog Corner sum up the man quite well! nt - Dman 05:44:47 11/13/14 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: "...and Quad 57s." - tesla 10:05:01 11/13/14 (1)
- First heard a pair at a guys house... - Ivan303 12:20:14 11/13/14 (0)