RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - New York Times on Harry Pearson - Peter Breuninger 05:14:27 11/13/14 (68)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - fantja 10:41:14 11/13/14 (0)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Pat D 09:21:29 11/13/14 (42)

Well, the denizens here have certainly excoriated you... - rlw 11:53:30 11/14/14 (0)

"We know speakers sound different"? Actually, "we" know - from experience - much more than that. - carcass93 08:58:21 11/14/14 (1)

+1 nt - Tony Lauck 11:41:29 11/14/14 (0)

Your - kavakidd 23:19:27 11/13/14 (2)

RE: Your - Pat D 11:26:51 11/14/14 (1)

RE: Your - kavakidd 16:12:48 11/14/14 (0)

We are SO LUCKY that he wasn't OVER-QUALIFIED for the job - jedrider 11:16:19 11/13/14 (0)

It appears you found... - mkuller 10:54:53 11/13/14 (5)

RE: It appears you found... - Pat D 11:12:10 11/14/14 (3)

RE: It appears you found... - mkuller 12:04:56 11/14/14 (2)

RE: It appears you found... - Pat D 20:21:54 11/14/14 (1)

RE: It appears you found... - mkuller 21:44:26 11/14/14 (0)

RE: It appears you found... - middleground 11:08:07 11/13/14 (0)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Ozzy 09:53:50 11/13/14 (2)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Pat D 11:44:52 11/14/14 (1)

"...the accurate ones"? - mkuller 21:51:35 11/14/14 (0)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - tesla 09:43:53 11/13/14 (18)

If you'd like to revisit that review - E-Stat 14:54:06 11/13/14 (1)

Under HP's influence . . . - M3 lover 17:29:48 11/13/14 (0)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - mkuller 09:53:17 11/13/14 (15)

"...in 1976, what was better than stacked Advents?" - rlw 12:55:55 11/14/14 (2)

RE: "...in 1976, what was better than stacked Advents?" - seas 09:48:16 11/15/14 (0)

RE: "...in 1976, what was better than stacked Advents?" - Pat D 20:28:03 11/14/14 (0)

Don't forget - Des 15:16:15 11/13/14 (0)

If you return to Issue 1 - E-Stat 10:11:47 11/13/14 (7)

RE: If you return to Issue 1 - mkuller 10:42:35 11/13/14 (6)

Actually... - E-Stat 11:08:32 11/13/14 (5)

I'm sure I wouldn't want anyone here to know what I was listening to.... - Ivan303 12:12:06 11/13/14 (4)

Why not? - E-Stat 12:45:34 11/13/14 (3)

That's a darn good system, homes! - rlw 13:07:30 11/14/14 (0)

OK, mid 60's I wasn't doing too bad.. - Ivan303 13:18:33 11/13/14 (1)

RE: OK, mid 60's I wasn't doing too bad.. - E-Stat 13:45:06 11/13/14 (0)

RE: "...and Quad 57s." - Ivan303 10:02:28 11/13/14 (2)

RE: "...and Quad 57s." - tesla 10:05:01 11/13/14 (1)

First heard a pair at a guys house... - Ivan303 12:20:14 11/13/14 (0)

RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Ivan303 09:31:05 11/13/14 (6)

Does Michael Schumacher - E-Stat 09:55:38 11/13/14 (3)

RE: Does Michael Schumacher - middleground 10:34:53 11/13/14 (2)

RE: Does Michael Schumacher - bjh 11:12:55 11/13/14 (1)

Neil Armstrong taught my dad calculus... - rlw 13:15:30 11/14/14 (0)

RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Ozzy 09:55:08 11/13/14 (1)

RE: "that means he was not really qualified to be a professional reviewer of audio equipment"... - Pat D 10:20:52 11/14/14 (0)

Gotta admit, the New York Times is still the benchmark for how a paper is written. - David S. 09:00:18 11/13/14 (20)

RE: Really?.... - wangmr 23:00:37 11/13/14 (0)

RE: Gotta admit, the New York Times is still the benchmark for how a paper is written. - middleground 10:37:44 11/13/14 (1)

I may not agree with ALL of HP's ideas, but think the obit was well done. - David S. 10:45:49 11/14/14 (0)

NYT not nearly as good as WSJ - Mike K 09:45:14 11/13/14 (15)

Rubbish! - rlw 13:20:14 11/14/14 (0)

I was thinking that LATimes is pretty good - jedrider 10:31:59 11/13/14 (1)

You need to train that dog to use the out of doors for relief! * - Mike K 17:24:53 11/13/14 (0)

RE: NYT not nearly as good as WSJ - mkuller 09:50:10 11/13/14 (11)

RE: NYT not nearly as good as WSJ - fin1bxn@msn.com 08:35:52 11/14/14 (1)

Good at what? - mkuller 10:44:19 11/14/14 (0)

"WSJ is Fox News in print" - Ozzy 07:10:35 11/14/14 (5)

Are you serious?! - rlw 13:22:34 11/14/14 (4)

RE: Are you serious?! - Ozzy 16:14:49 11/14/14 (3)

RE: Are you serious?! - mkuller 18:25:26 11/14/14 (2)

RE: Are you serious?! - Ozzy 03:42:20 11/15/14 (1)

Yes! - mkuller 09:26:42 11/15/14 (0)

Standard of what??! - kavakidd 23:27:10 11/13/14 (1)

RE: Standard of what??! - mkuller 08:13:27 11/14/14 (0)

+1 - Sondek 12:11:33 11/13/14 (0)

I was thinking the same thing. Very classy (nt) - 4everyoung 09:17:52 11/13/14 (0)

Very nice...(nt) - mkuller 08:13:04 11/13/14 (0)

I agree - Brian Walsh 06:11:41 11/13/14 (0)

That and Michael Fremer's wonderful posting in Analog Corner sum up the man quite well! nt - Dman 05:44:47 11/13/14 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Ozzy 09:53:50 11/13/14 (2)

RE: New York Times on Harry Pearson - Pat D 11:44:52 11/14/14 (1)

"...the accurate ones"? - mkuller 21:51:35 11/14/14 (0)

Post a Message!