|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: ask yourself posted by unclestu on September 3, 2014 at 22:53:02:
I think that I have examined and re-examined my "suppositions". In addition, I've been using my ears. The question is, have you been doing these things? I have my doubts that you have been.
Despite all of the "advances" you list above and despite your optimistic attitude, I notice that you have not named one single "phase coherent transducer" produced by these technological "advances" that has successfully combines every desirable sonic characteristic in proper balance - AND IS THOUGHT OF AS SUCH BY A MAJORITY OF LISTENERS, be they "serious listeners" (burp!) or otherwise. So, do you have any brand names or facts to present, or is this just more colorful theorizing and wishful thinking from Unclestu?As if simply creating a "phase coherent transducer" was a desirable goal...
Creating a time/phase coherent transducer that does not compromise more highly regarded aspects of speaker performance might be a desirable and worthy goal - for those who claim to be able to hear the effects of "incoherence", at least.
Also, show me one study proving or even implying that your so-called "serious listeners" can hear any better than young, healthy college students. You can't? I didn't think so...
More smoke and mirrors from Unclestu, I guess.
Edits: 09/03/14 09/03/14 09/03/14 09/04/14 09/04/14 09/04/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "I think you better re-examine your suppositions." - genungo 23:18:40 09/03/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
