In Reply to: RE: "Whether or not it is perceivable is another matter." posted by genungo on September 3, 2014 at 20:06:51:
Firstly, thanks for quietly correcting my misspelling of "perceivable".
However, with regard to sound, you're on the wrong track. Whether or not the polarity of a reproduced sound is audible to a particular individual isn't the question.
As I wrote, this issue has been studied in-depth.
Reproducing an acoustic waveform correctly, with regard to polarity, is the more desirable approach. This is clear.
Subjective preference by a particular individual is an entirely different matter.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Whether or not it is perceivable is another matter." - Inmate51 21:16:14 09/03/14 (3)
- RE: "However, with regard to sound, you're on the wrong track." - genungo 22:35:49 09/03/14 (2)
- ask yourself - unclestu 22:53:02 09/03/14 (1)
- RE: "I think you better re-examine your suppositions." - genungo 23:18:40 09/03/14 (0)