|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Gordon Holt, "subjective flatness", etc... posted by hahax@verizon.net on August 18, 2014 at 09:22:48:
If he had known about my definition of musicality, I'm pretty sure that he would have believed in it. You are the one with the mental block, as far as I can tell.Holt believed in the "subjective evaluation" of audio gear, did he not? And, when I use the word "musical" that is exactly the type of thing that I'm referring to (I keep on explaining this, but you don't seem to hear). The *reason why* Holt believed in the "subjectively evaluation" of audio sound is because he knew that it was the only way to make sure that audio sounded like... (drum roll please!) "MUSIC".
"Music".., "Musical".., "Musicality"... "Musical Accuracy"... "Musical Fidelity", etc... Get it?
Maybe I'm unaware of what the word "musicality" was supposed to mean back when Holt was alive but I really don't care about that, partly because I have the feeling that it always was a fairly vague term. So now, this (the above) is what the word "musicality" means to ME. I am trying to make the term seem like less of a vague thing, the only requirement being that you read and try to understand what I'm saying.
Edits: 08/18/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Gordon Holt did not believe in musicality" - genungo 09:57:52 08/18/14 (3)
- RE: "Gordon Holt did not believe in musicality" - hahax@verizon.net 13:04:29 08/19/14 (0)
- RE: "Gordon Holt did not believe in musicality"U - DrChaos 17:08:47 08/18/14 (1)
- RE: "I don't think it was any mystical experience or philosophical hoo ha."U - genungo 18:56:44 08/18/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
