In Reply to: Both........... posted by Todd Krieger on April 9, 2014 at 23:32:50:
Hi,
i start from the consideration that many people consider tapes the best medium.
So measuring their dynamic range would be a good reference for digital medium requirements.
Moreover i wonder which is the max available dynamic range with vinyl.
I am very curious because also vinyl has many supporters.
I do not think that LPs have more than let's say 96dB dynamic range
Found this ... i do not know it it is true or not, as usual" •Live music can have a dynamic range as high as 100-120 dB (very loud!)
•Compact discs have a maximum dynamic range of 96dB
•An LP has a dynamic range of approximately 65dB
•Magnetic tape (cassette, reel to reel) has a dynamic range of approximately 55-60 dB "If this is true the problem with cd does not seem the dynamic range
Personally i prefer 48k instead of 44.1k
Because i listened to some digital audio tapes and they were fantastic.
I am trying to convince a friend who has bought a really fine Pioneer Dat to make some good copies of high quality LPs for comparison tests.
Thanks a lot.
Kind regards,
bg
Edits: 04/10/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I wonder which is the actual dynamic range of tapes ? - beppe61 05:58:33 04/10/14 (7)
- I seem to recall my Revox B77 had about 70 dB. - StephenJK 06:30:44 04/10/14 (6)
- Thank you. So it seems to me that the dynamic range available with basic CD format is more than enough - beppe61 08:34:04 04/10/14 (5)
- See, that's where the big problem is - geoffkait 08:56:51 04/10/14 (4)
- RE: CDs that sound "thin, papier mache-ish, lifeless, blah, etc..." - genungo 08:24:37 04/13/14 (0)
- As someone else have said there is a lot of manipulation - beppe61 10:01:51 04/10/14 (0)
- No you're not the only one but I find it an unfair (to digital) generalization. - Goober58 09:21:56 04/10/14 (1)
- "People seem to expect and like the colorations/distortions of vinyl." - b.l.zeebub 09:31:41 04/10/14 (0)