In Reply to: RE: right but does that (using manufactured CDs) validate hi-rez recording? posted by StephenJK on April 9, 2014 at 13:42:35:
"Perhaps I'm not explaining myself very well. I was making a comparison between vinyl and CD because with the equipment that I have it's all that I can do. I can't use an HD download file because I can't be sure of it's provenance."
That hardly makes your comparison reasonable or worthwhile in justifying high definition recording.
"We do seem to be in agreement that there is definitely a difference between HD and CD, which is what started all of this - too many claims that CD "perfect sound forever" is the pinnacle of achievement that can't be surpassed."
What we agree upon is there's definitely a difference between vinyl and CDs. IMO this has more to do with manufacturing than analog v. digital.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: right but does that (using manufactured CDs) validate hi-rez recording? - Goober58 14:13:21 04/09/14 (4)
- I'm not justifying high resolution recording. - StephenJK 15:01:36 04/09/14 (3)
- And I told you even a CD quality recording of vinyl sounds better than a manufactured CD! - Goober58 16:18:31 04/09/14 (2)
- That makes no sense. You're saying that a CD recording of an original LP sounds better than - tinear 13:40:35 04/11/14 (1)
- That's not what I said but I suppose that's possible too! - Goober58 17:56:45 04/11/14 (0)