General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: YES! THANK YOU! posted by newdreams on April 8, 2014 at 10:08:52:
...you have it wrong.
Hearing, listening, enjoying music is what we do.
Owning equipment which pleases the eye has no more to do "with the experience of hearing music" than audio DBTs.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - newdreams 10:43:24 04/07/14 (85)
- As I have said before, it is very easy to hear the difference in tonality... - Steve Parry 14:59:07 04/09/14 (0)
- NO, they could tell the difference. They just liked one of the new ones best - richardl 14:23:59 04/09/14 (0)
- RE: Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - Ozzie 13:21:28 04/09/14 (0)
- RE: Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - c1ferrari 22:17:15 04/08/14 (1)
- " when the instruments are actually being played by them " - FenderLover 00:33:02 04/09/14 (0)
- So what? - Frihed89 15:02:49 04/08/14 (0)
- I wonder where they found all those blind violinists? - FenderLover 02:04:27 04/08/14 (0)
- Wrong conclusion. - DrChaos 22:12:44 04/07/14 (9)
- RE: Wrong conclusion. - newdreams 10:00:25 04/08/14 (2)
- You gotta pay $2000 for a decent acoustic guitars! Let's see that demonstrated in a blind test. LOL nt - bjh 11:47:04 04/08/14 (1)
- RE: You gotta pay $2000 for a decent acoustic guitars! Let's see that demonstrated in a blind test. LOL nt - newdreams 13:15:12 04/08/14 (0)
- YES! THANK YOU! - Jim Austin 08:32:26 04/08/14 (5)
- Nicely put. - RC Daniel 16:51:03 04/11/14 (0)
- Hear hear! :-)) But .... - andyr 13:25:31 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: YES! THANK YOU! - bjh 11:44:15 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: YES! THANK YOU! - newdreams 10:08:52 04/08/14 (1)
- RE: YES! THANK YOU! - mkuller 20:44:51 04/08/14 (0)
- Overall Strads sound better because (overall) the better players get them. Is that so hard to understand? LOL - bjh 19:00:24 04/07/14 (2)
- RE: Overall Strads sound better because (overall) the better players get them. Is that so hard to understand? LOL - middleground 19:42:30 04/07/14 (1)
- Love you too, Sweetie! nt - bjh 22:45:53 04/07/14 (0)
- RE: Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - fantja 17:47:34 04/07/14 (1)
- RE: Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - middleground 04:12:25 04/08/14 (0)
- No Surprise - Awe-d-o-file 17:46:21 04/07/14 (2)
- And who says audiophiles' hearing is better than average, too? nt - tinear 20:38:55 04/07/14 (1)
- I didn't nor will I - Awe-d-o-file 06:25:21 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - bjh 17:33:28 04/07/14 (0)
- How long did they "break-in" their handkerchiefs? nt - tinear 17:26:49 04/07/14 (2)
- Perhaps they had them cryo-ed first... (nt) - newdreams 17:30:56 04/07/14 (1)
- I believe virgin Pima cotton, organic and un-dyed, is more "Strad." Cashmere sounds more, "Guar-like." nt - tinear 20:36:55 04/07/14 (0)
- RE: Blind-tested soloists unable to tell Stradivarius violins from modern instruments - SgreenP@MSN.com 17:12:29 04/07/14 (0)
- Happy to kill this thread - newdreams 16:48:18 04/07/14 (3)
- An innocent question - geoffkait 05:17:35 04/08/14 (0)
- Use the "Alert Moderator" link at the top of the page... - Steve O 17:10:42 04/07/14 (1)
- ... if you don't have in you to stop yourself. LOL nt - bjh 17:21:20 04/07/14 (0)
- Am I misunderstanding this... - welly 16:02:52 04/07/14 (4)
- RE: Am I misunderstanding this... - Ozzie 18:08:31 04/07/14 (3)
- RE: Am I misunderstanding this... - welly 22:12:48 04/07/14 (2)
- RE: Am I misunderstanding this... - middleground 04:18:30 04/08/14 (1)
- RE: Am I misunderstanding this... - welly 06:32:57 04/08/14 (0)
- Read the link in E-Stat's post... - mkuller 15:15:47 04/07/14 (10)
- RE: Read the link in OP - Cpk 15:56:00 04/07/14 (9)
- RE: Read the link in OP - Pat D 17:48:25 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: Read the link in OP - middleground 04:20:55 04/08/14 (1)
- RE: Read the link in OP - Cpk 08:24:39 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: Read the link in OP - Ozzie 18:17:50 04/07/14 (3)
- RE: Don't play an instrument do you...../t - Cpk 18:26:31 04/07/14 (2)
- Haha, cute. - Ozzie 19:27:09 04/07/14 (1)
- RE: Not might, will - Cpk 08:38:37 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: Read the link in OP - genungo 16:59:31 04/07/14 (1)
- RE: Read the link in OP - Cpk 18:19:48 04/07/14 (0)
- All violins sound the same! Moving on ... Nt - bjh 15:06:45 04/07/14 (4)
- You were being sarcastic, weren't you? - jusbe 00:56:35 04/10/14 (0)
- RE: All violins sound the same! Moving on ... Nt - middleground 04:23:20 04/08/14 (1)
- RE: All violins sound the same! Moving on ... Nt - bjh 12:12:35 04/08/14 (0)
- +1 /-t\ - jusbe 16:28:44 04/07/14 (0)
- So.. You think this shows double blind testing is valid? Or that the parameters realy matter? - Elizabeth 14:51:56 04/07/14 (0)
- Been Posted, Discussed Extensively - Inmate51 13:12:13 04/07/14 (0)
- We've talked about this before - E-Stat 12:59:40 04/07/14 (16)
- RE: We've talked about this before - Pat D 17:41:17 04/08/14 (0)
- Sounds like a cop-out to me - Feanor 20:23:23 04/07/14 (1)
- Would you pay - E-Stat 05:41:10 04/08/14 (0)
- Thanks for posting this... - mkuller 15:00:17 04/07/14 (12)
- Well, at some point, why don't DBT tests have results doubters expect? - tinear 20:52:01 04/07/14 (5)
- RE: Well, at some point, why don't DBT tests have results doubters expect? - DrChaos 22:52:56 04/07/14 (0)
- RE: Well, at some point, why don't DBT tests have results doubters expect? - middleground 22:50:51 04/07/14 (0)
- RE: Well, at some point, why don't DBT tests have results doubters expect? - mkuller 21:58:37 04/07/14 (2)
- Well, that's convincing. Let's all just anoint you as the ARBITER OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING. - tinear 08:00:34 04/08/14 (1)
- Blinded by SCIENCE... - mkuller 10:10:02 04/08/14 (0)
- It's always about the details... - E-Stat 15:15:36 04/07/14 (5)
- Yes, that was the definitive paragraph - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 06:55:22 04/08/14 (1)
- Well worded - E-Stat 07:10:29 04/08/14 (0)
- Too funny yet... - mkuller 15:17:15 04/07/14 (2)
- Even out of tune... - Ozzie 17:45:13 04/07/14 (1)
- The test was... - mkuller 20:31:41 04/07/14 (0)
- It says that they were comparing "tonal qualities", and if so... - genungo 11:55:10 04/07/14 (8)
- You've got to read more carefully - Cpk 13:17:39 04/07/14 (5)
- RE: Read more carefully - genungo 13:31:41 04/07/14 (4)
- RE: Don't think it was flawed - Cpk 13:45:58 04/07/14 (3)
- RE: Don't think - genungo 13:52:43 04/07/14 (2)
- RE: Don't think - middleground 04:15:55 04/08/14 (1)
- Threatened? All I know is that it tickles... - genungo 05:57:27 04/08/14 (0)
- RE: It says that they were comparing "tonal qualities", and if so... - middleground 12:16:46 04/07/14 (1)
- RE: "...bloody deaf and silly they were." - genungo 12:55:39 04/07/14 (0)
- This is competing with the tube motherboard.. - Iron Knee 11:21:26 04/07/14 (0)
- Isn't this just like testing audio gear - audiozorro 11:14:39 04/07/14 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: YES! THANK YOU! - mkuller 20:44:51 04/08/14 (0)