In Reply to: RE: Read the link in OP posted by Cpk on April 7, 2014 at 15:56:00:
After the first flawed test, it should have been obvious that a number of rules and procedures needed to be revised or changed. However, there is no indication that basic procedures ever were revised for this latest test. I'm going to ignore the results of both tests, at least until more detailed info is made available.I think I might smell a marketing scheme...
I predict that "new" and "definitive" test results will continue to appear throughout the next 20 years or so to "prove" (of course) that modern instruments can sound just as good as the old antique ones that we will soon be forced to shelve (The older ones might be nearing the end of their usable lifespan!).
Edits: 04/07/14 04/07/14 04/07/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Read the link in OP - genungo 16:59:31 04/07/14 (1)
- RE: Read the link in OP - Cpk 18:19:48 04/07/14 (0)