In Reply to: RE: The first line of my first comment in this thread posted by soulfood on April 5, 2014 at 11:37:49:
"I may have called you out by responding but that's no personal attack. If it will make you feel better concede the argument."Called me out? BS you couldn't even respond on point. All you did was rip out a bunch of suggestive ad-hominem and hoped it stuck.
Most certainly I would concede part or all of the comment provided someone with the where with all to shoot it down steps up to do it.
You haven't come close to demonstrating you've got what it takes.
"A conspiracy of one (you-the messenger), makes little sense."
You missed my point - see below.
"I disagree with your agenda. "
Yes of course you can disagree with my suggestion and that's fair enough. However that disagreement in no way influences how these kinds of entities operate and what influences the decisions they make. My conspiracy theory comment was based on your disagreement (clear from your 1st response) and your dismissal of my clearly stated point the first line of my comments. Ie. my referring to it, the financial motivation, must mean that I am suggesting some kind of conspiracy on the part of AA (or in other conversations the industry in general). I am not. You're the one wearing blinders.
Now my agenda was actually something else.....
Edits: 04/05/14 04/05/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The first line of my first comment in this thread - Goober58 17:17:17 04/05/14 (2)
- RE: The first line of my first comment in this thread - soulfood 05:17:46 04/06/14 (1)
- RE: The first line of my first comment in this thread - Goober58 08:54:57 04/06/14 (0)