In Reply to: To Those That Bitch About The Excessive Cost of Systems.... posted by howard on August 31, 2012 at 09:12:05:
I wonder why.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- NASA gave Kubrick Two $1.5M lenses - barryb 15:17:48 08/31/12 (11)
- I don't think NASA gave Kubrick Two $1.5M lenses - R Browne 20:03:19 08/31/12 (6)
- RE: I don't think NASA gave Kubrick Two $1.5M lenses - Utley1 09:48:04 09/01/12 (0)
- I'm going by Jay Weidner - barryb 07:36:43 09/01/12 (0)
- RE:why was K. looking for a very fast, not very slow lense (no text) - Hi-Fi Nut 07:17:27 09/01/12 (0)
- Nope, you're wrong. - Mr. Dick Hertz 20:26:16 08/31/12 (2)
- They must have a very broad agenda. - R Browne 20:40:44 08/31/12 (1)
- RE: They must have a very broad agenda. - josh358 10:03:08 09/01/12 (0)
- Maybe NASA wasn't going to use them. Maybe Kubrick just borrowed them and returned them when he was done. - Mr. Dick Hertz 18:27:26 08/31/12 (0)
- General is not for flinging your conspiracy poo, amigo. - Enophile 17:11:31 08/31/12 (0)
- so he could (try to) photoegraph your brain * - rlindsa 15:25:14 08/31/12 (1)
- How do you "photoegraph" your brain? - barryb 16:45:48 08/31/12 (0)