thinking here of sudz's latest generality question of musicians and below-par hi-fi systems but that's just an example and this is not about sudz or his posts in the least. i wonder why people refuse to wonder about people and behavior and if there is a link/connection for ""most"" (a generality). if there is a connection of, say, 70%, that would seem of interest. furthermore, it's not just a numerical fact either: desire can also be seen to show a tendency in one direction or other eg - using sudz's question - if musicians or studio engineers or whoever state a lack of interest in high-end systems. suppose a thread was posted on a pharmacy forum and it asked if pharmacists use medications more than the mass public? would that question get attacked too?
thanks for interest.
H.F.N.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - the forum's attack on questions of generality - Hi-Fi Nut 23:02:59 08/15/12 (31)
- the forum's attack on questions of generality - thanks, all [no text] - Hi-Fi Nut 05:45:34 08/20/12 (0)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - IEaudiodude 08:34:49 08/17/12 (1)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - Raymond Leggs 09:43:21 08/17/12 (0)
- Your'e over-thinking the situation - petertg 06:20:14 08/17/12 (0)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - IEaudiodude 04:35:55 08/17/12 (1)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - IEaudiodude 04:37:40 08/17/12 (0)
- Pharmacists... - mkuller 21:53:28 08/16/12 (0)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - Kirk57 13:40:54 08/16/12 (4)
- I agree about the reaction to sudz - jult52 03:20:23 08/17/12 (1)
- RE: I agree about the reaction to sudz - sudz1234@yahoo.com 03:57:03 08/17/12 (0)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - middleground 19:34:27 08/16/12 (1)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - sudz1234@yahoo.com 20:52:14 08/16/12 (0)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - SgreenP@MSN.com 08:10:24 08/16/12 (7)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - soulfood 04:52:03 08/17/12 (5)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - Mike Mc 05:04:22 08/17/12 (4)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - soulfood 08:11:49 08/17/12 (3)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - Hi-Fi Nut 08:19:26 08/17/12 (2)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - soulfood 10:54:29 08/17/12 (1)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - IEaudiodude 11:25:51 08/17/12 (0)
- RE: the forum's attack on questions of generality - Spkr_Bldr 21:58:18 08/16/12 (0)
- Generalities imply that something is connected to something else - Frihed89 08:08:46 08/16/12 (0)
- Generalities seem to be frowned upon in general... - musetap 08:01:21 08/16/12 (1)
- RE: Generalities seem to be frowned upon in general... - soulfood 09:40:53 08/16/12 (0)
- History - slapshot 07:29:27 08/16/12 (1)
- well said-nt - Green Lantern 19:26:09 08/16/12 (0)
- Specifically, a tail chasing troll. -nt - soulfood 05:01:17 08/16/12 (0)
- Generality vs. Specificty - Thorsten 03:21:02 08/16/12 (3)
- RE: Generality vs. Specificty: doesn't answer 'desire' (2nd part of question) [no text] - Hi-Fi Nut 06:50:02 08/16/12 (2)
- Desire is always specific, never general... (NT) - Thorsten 13:44:49 08/16/12 (1)
- PS, I am no Pharmacist, but I always take my Med's, only way to stay sane... - Thorsten 13:49:55 08/16/12 (0)
- the subject title of your post seemed promising - Green Lantern 02:15:59 08/16/12 (0)