In Reply to: Abe, You Stated Above... posted by Doug Schroeder on August 5, 2012 at 20:06:18:
While informative your response is also a sort of evasion. You say:
"I could make several lists of rankings based on the Power paradigm, the Signal Flow paradigm, the Manufactuter Quality paradigm."
Well, why don't you rank the paradigms then and give the list for the top one? Or are you saying these all yield equivalent results? In the latter case, how do you pick a system for yourself and what is the list for that?
Or, since you likely have at least one actual system for yourself, what order do you put its parts in as it stands, regardless of other possibilities. The question asked is fairly clear however limited or whether or not it yields results you find tuseful.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Abe, You Stated Above... - riboge 07:43:58 08/06/12 (4)
- Why Should I Rank My System When I Have Stated There Is No Advantage to Doing So?... - Doug Schroeder 13:48:30 08/06/12 (3)
- Because that is what the thread is about - riboge 14:57:54 08/06/12 (1)
- From What I Have Seen... - Doug Schroeder 17:29:41 08/06/12 (0)
- RE: Why Should I Rank My System When I Have Stated There Is No Advantage to Doing So?... - fmak 14:06:42 08/06/12 (0)