In Reply to: Jolida Lawsuit posted by mbnx01 on July 9, 2012 at 10:15:10:
The French distributor could not be haled into a court in Maryland, either state or Federal, consistent with traditional notions of fair play and due process.
JoLida failed to carry its burden to get an injunction.
The motion to remand was denied.
Much ado about not much; no money will change hands between the opposing parties as a result of this, but, to get to the point where some starry-eyed Federal Court law clerk, dreaming of being the next Sotomayor or Kagan, can summon the resolve to distill all the caterwauling (no offense personally meant to anyone including the litigants), most have cost high five or low six figures, or the lawyers are working very cheap.
John Marks
Speaking only for himself
Vanderbilt Law School, Class of 1979 (am I that old?)
# # #
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- It appears to be a collection of preliminary, procedural skirmishes - John Marks 13:53:00 07/09/12 (5)
- you must be a lawyer - mbnx01 15:19:14 07/09/12 (4)
- I think he said... - AbeCollins 16:00:56 07/09/12 (3)
- Paid, or not... - John Marks 16:24:12 07/09/12 (2)
- RE: Paid, or not... - Bill the K 20:20:29 07/09/12 (1)
- Clerked at Audio Asylum.....! - Frihed89 22:01:35 07/09/12 (0)