In Reply to: Are you hooked by looks? posted by jsm71 on July 2, 2012 at 10:20:43:
Given two equally good sounding pieces of gear, that cost approximately the same, I will typically take the one that I think looks better. (But if it comes down to paying big bucks for a good looking piece of gear, versus a utilitarian looking piece of gear that costs considerable less and sounds the same, then I'll usually take the utilitarian one.)
But if a piece of gear is what I consider "Butt Ugly", then I will typically not even consider it. Why would I want to look upon something that I think is ugly for the rest of my life, when there is plenty of gear around that not only sounds as good, but looks at least decent, if not actually good? (And, my wife and I have somewhat similar tastes, and if I think it is Butt Ugly, then I know for sure she will too. And so there is no way I want to put up with the constant nagging about having some Butt Ugly piece of gear in my living room, (which is where my stereo is), for the rest of my life.)
Been there, done that; so I've learned my lesson!
Besides, she'll typically authorize the spending of additional funds to buy a better looking piece of gear that sounds as good. (She hated my Martin Logan Sequel II speakers, and she let me spend what she considered a lot of money on other speakers to get rid of them.)
My two cents worth anyway.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No, but I can be put off by "Butt Ugly"! ;-) - Raiderman 16:48:31 07/02/12 (0)