38.112.153.190
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: You said that "You" have a therory. I have a therory that the sky is blue. posted by fredtr on November 06, 2009 at 15:14:38
I think the reason you got teased by the mob is that your original post claimed a fairly well acknowledged phenomenon as being a theory of yours, and yet it's a phenomenon that's been discussed a fair amount (even if not in relation to the book you cited).
But I find your examples above to be interesting. Had you included them as observations in your original post, rather than presenting the phenomenon as a "theory", I think folks would have reacted differently and joined in with some of their own observations. Hey, it's tough crowd here sometimes!
I'll give an example to add to yours: When I first bought my CJ CA200, a 185wpc ss integrated, I bought it after an audition in which I loved the transparency and sweet top end, but was a bit put off by the leanness of its midrange. Not typical CJ sound in my experience. After deciding to buy it, I had buyer's remorse for awhile because the leanness was leaving me a bit cold. But after awhile, I really came to love the transparency and neutrality, the strong bottom end and the sweet highs. And yet, in this case, I know it was not burn in because the demo I'd heard had lots of hours on it, and yet out of the box I thought my new unit sounded quite similar.
It is an interesting phenomenon.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: