"Detection threshold for distortions due to jitter in digital audio"
Ashihara et al.,. Acoustical Science and Technology 26, 1 (2005)
"Benjamin and Gannon (AES preprint 4826, 1998) made an attempt to measure thresholds of audibility for sinusoidal jitter on program material. Their study seems to have a few problems, however. In their study, a special arrangement was made to the reproduction system in order to add jitter at the digital interface. It is not known if such an arrangement might change sound quality and affect the results. Secondly, they employed a self-administered threshold evaluation in which the listeners determined their thresholds at their discretion. Their results might contain errors due to the cognitive factor.""As Benjamin and Gannon reported, detection thresholds for jitter may depend on how well the listeners are trained."
"Listeners in the present study were audio professionals or semi-professionals who were supposed to be well-trained listeners. They were audio critics, sound engineers and musicians."
"Experiments were carried out in the listening booth or studio that each listener had offered. The examiner only brought there a personal computer with digital audio interface and a mouse and each listener provided his or her favorite DAC, amplifiers and loudspeakers."
"A software simulator of jitter was used. The distorted versions [of the raw PCM data] were prepared by adding artificial random jitter of various amounts ("Simulation of sound degradation due to time jitter on digital audio", Ashihara et al., J. of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 58, 232-238 (2002)). Although most of these materials were music sound recorded on commercial package media, there were also recordings from radio dramas."
"Discrimination tests were performed in a 2 alternative forced choice paradigm. Each run consisted of a full reproduction of a material. The duration of sound materials ranged from about 2min. to 4min. During a run, two versions of the same material were simultaneously reproduced. They were a reference version without jitter and an artificially jittered version. Only one of them could be presented acoustically in the foreground while the other was reproduced in the background (muted). the foreground and the background could be switched by a listener at any moment in the run."
"A PC monitor was placed in front of a listener. On its screen, three buttons were displayed. Each button was labeled either A, B, or X, respectively.""It can be concluded that detection threshold for random jitter added to program materials is several hundreds ns even for well-trained listeners under their preferable listening conditions. In some contents of conventional CDs, it had been observed that jitter had to be as small as several hundreds ps to preserve the resolution of 16 bits ("The maximum permissible size and detection threshold of time jitter on digital audio", Ashihara et al., J of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 59, 241-249 (2003)). This is way below the detection threshold values. Nishimura et al. made attempts to measure actual jitter of various DA systems during reproduction of music signals. They could not detect any jitter larger than 3 ns in their measurements (“Measurement of sampling jitter using a musical signalâ€, Nishimura et al., AES paper 5797)
"So far, actual jitter in consumer products seems to be too small to be detected at least for reproduction of music signals."
“The results indicate that the threshold for random jitter on program material is several hundreds ns for well-trained listeners under their preferable listening conditions. The threshold values seem to be sufficiently larger than the jitter actually observed in various consumer products.â€
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - KlausR. 00:30:05 05/13/07 (11)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - jeff mai 02:17:50 05/13/07 (8)
- It actually is signal-correlated jitter - KlausR. 06:55:20 05/15/07 (1)
- The article summary states "random jitter" - jeff mai 15:34:32 05/15/07 (0)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - blue_z 15:10:41 05/13/07 (5)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - jeff mai 16:24:33 05/13/07 (0)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - Todd Krieger 15:42:19 05/13/07 (3)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - the roofman 11:10:06 05/14/07 (0)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - blue_z 19:09:35 05/13/07 (1)
- Re: Audibiliy of jitter in digital audio - Todd Krieger 00:13:02 05/14/07 (0)
- This confirms what many already know - Frihed89 00:49:52 05/13/07 (1)
- I only have 10% agreement of that statement. - Yashu 13:56:22 05/13/07 (0)