Really what is the seller trying to say? Is it just me or do these sellers actually believe these statements cover their butts in some or even most cases?My standard form letter regarding "as-is" and "no guarantee against shipping damage" sales.
Hi,
This is a question about your "as-is" designation.
Does it mean that the unit is guaranteed to be as you described it or does it mean that the unit is guaranteed to arrive in whatever condition it arrives in. You say it works great but if it arrives and it doesn't work or works poorly will you refund the purchase price?
I don't mind paying for insurance but insurance only covers me for visible damage or loss and it only provides coverage if the seller packages the item properly. You say you are not responsible for shipping damage. But unless you properly package the item even insurance won't cover the item. You seem to be claiming you would not be responsible if the item is improperly packaged. Do you guarantee proper packaging so that the buyer can be insure himself against any possible loss.
Thanks - I'm going to bid on this item but how much I bid will depend on your response. Thanks!
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - Don T 12:03:26 04/12/07 (47)
- Re: "as-is" and - what does it mean? - jensw 20:50:32 04/13/07 (0)
- Re: "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:05:20 04/13/07 (0)
- It means seller figures someone's likely to get burned... - bartc 09:41:44 04/13/07 (0)
- As a buyer I expect item to arrive "as described" by the seller - Don T 09:41:11 04/13/07 (0)
- It does NOT mean the seller is a crook - Feanor 09:23:35 04/13/07 (3)
- Agreed but... - Don T 09:46:23 04/13/07 (2)
- Yep, fair, but ... - Feanor 16:30:49 04/13/07 (1)
- Re: Yep, fair, but ... - Don T 17:07:03 04/13/07 (0)
- Re: "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - kentaja@yahoo.com 08:06:57 04/13/07 (7)
- Re: "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - Don T 09:52:03 04/13/07 (1)
- Re: "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - kentaja@yahoo.com 10:19:54 04/13/07 (0)
- FOB, I believe - Feanor 09:06:44 04/13/07 (4)
- Re: FOB, I believe - kentaja@yahoo.com 10:03:54 04/13/07 (2)
- Thought you said you'd never had shipping damage? - Feanor 16:42:29 04/13/07 (1)
- Re: Thought you said you'd never had shipping damage? - kentaja@yahoo.com 23:27:57 04/13/07 (0)
- That's "Free On Board" - Feanor 09:33:22 04/13/07 (0)
- Re: "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - Dave Pogue 05:28:05 04/13/07 (0)
- \\\Really what is the seller trying to say?///............ - three_sox 23:48:51 04/12/07 (2)
- Re: \\\Really what is the seller trying to say?///............ - Don T 17:11:54 04/13/07 (1)
- Yeah, fair enough ....... - three_sox 18:36:29 04/13/07 (0)
- In simple terms: "It's already stuffed - and the shipper will claim it was damaged in transit!"... - DevillEars 23:07:47 04/12/07 (1)
- *DING*! ^^^^ what he said^^^ - Enchantment1.6s 06:04:15 04/13/07 (0)
- That English is not your first language? - LesF 20:05:51 04/12/07 (1)
- Best answer on another waste o' time thread. /nt/ - powermatic 09:19:45 04/14/07 (0)
- Like it or not, this is common, even typical - Feanor 16:54:58 04/12/07 (0)
- Re: "as-is" and "not guaranteed against shipping damage" - what does it mean? - keldasdad 16:44:10 04/12/07 (0)
- I agree with Elizabeth, it means look elsewhere. nt - Jackaro 16:15:34 04/12/07 (0)
- I would just not do business with such a seller. why bother with such a person? - Elizabeth 12:47:27 04/12/07 (19)
- Re: I would just not do business with such a seller. why bother with such a person? - BrassTeacher 16:34:19 04/15/07 (4)
- Sounds good to me. - Don T 10:44:24 04/17/07 (0)
- Then we agree!! Thanks for the warning. I'll just avoid your stuff! nt - Elizabeth 05:16:28 04/17/07 (2)
- Re: Then we agree!! Thanks for the warning. I'll just avoid your stuff! nt - BrassTeacher 08:58:27 04/17/07 (1)
- "It was their problem, not mine" . Tells all . nt - Elizabeth 11:29:41 04/18/07 (0)
- Let's put it this way, if Don T were on the run from the Law all they'd - bjh 19:13:32 04/12/07 (0)
- Re: Then do me a favor - J 18:48:10 04/12/07 (11)
- Don't worry! I'll AVOID your stuff as if it is a plague carrying rodent. Cheers!! nt - Elizabeth 05:18:13 04/17/07 (4)
- I'm not worried - J 12:04:47 04/17/07 (3)
- ?unbelievable? a little 'over the top'? Especially since it is true, I WOULD pass, feedback or not. nt - Elizabeth 11:27:31 04/18/07 (2)
- Beyond unbelievable - J 20:07:54 04/18/07 (1)
- I am not interested in so called internet dealers. When I buy used, it is from a fellow audio enthusiast. - Elizabeth 05:49:37 04/19/07 (0)
- Agree, and see my post above -nt - Feanor 09:09:53 04/13/07 (0)
- Re: Then do me a favor - middleground 05:51:58 04/13/07 (4)
- What? I said NOTHING of the kind - J 22:13:41 04/13/07 (0)
- do me a favor and leave the anti US BS out of forum posts - Kloss 06:35:22 04/13/07 (2)
- Re: do me a favor and leave the anti US BS out of forum posts - middleground 09:44:24 04/13/07 (0)
- "Lots of things in the US that you could complain about" That can be said about any country, really. )MT( - J. S. Bach 06:41:52 04/13/07 (0)
- Ditto - snert 16:47:59 04/12/07 (0)