|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Who Says It's the Music and Not the Playback?? posted by TomLarson on April 27, 2007 at 18:59:12:
"Sorry (really) to be so dense, but are you saying nothing had changed (and so a different day, a different perception) or the fact that you had somehow 'processed' the track on your pc made the difference?"It could have also been that he was in an exceptional mood....
But he was one of those who always thought Peart "overdid" the drum parts, but this last go-around, he said things seemed to make more sense, musically speaking. It just happened to be playing when he arrived- It wasn't something I queried him on. He on his own volition noticed something markedly different. He thought I was playing a different performance. (Although he found my explanation of using different sound and media drivers making such a difference a little far-fetched.)
If someone asked me what the biggest difference was between bad analog and bad digital, I always thought one could still listen through a bad analog recording and get a good impression the actual performance, where with bad digital, the recording may not be as outwardly bad, but the performance itself is downgraded.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Who Says It's the Music and Not the Playback?? - Todd Krieger 23:54:20 04/27/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
