|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: ROFL : "When Philips and Sony first made the CD, they didn't cut any corners ..." posted by The Sound Guy on April 23, 2007 at 21:39:48:
"IMHO, the difference between 96/24 and 44.1/16 is greater than uncompressed 44.1/16 and a 256kbps MP3 file."I have to kindly disagree with this one.... I've almost never experienced 24/96 that was listenable.
I do think had we gone 16/50, like you said, we wouldn't even have a format issue. Although I also think and we gone 16/50, vinyl wouldn't have survived.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: ROFL : "When Philips and Sony first made the CD, they didn't cut any corners ..." - Todd Krieger 02:03:54 04/24/07 (3)
- Re: ROFL : "When Philips and Sony first made the CD, they didn't cut any corners ..." - The Sound Guy 22:50:20 04/24/07 (0)
- So here's an interesting trend - Ralph 08:22:10 04/24/07 (1)
- The Problem With CD..... - Todd Krieger 13:49:34 04/24/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
