In Reply to: It was ME!!! But let's look at facts and some of your earlier posts posted by Kevin Deal on February 14, 2007 at 18:43:18:
I can't beleive you actually posted this , it puts you in such a poor light and basically proves the original posters point about his mistreatment. Seems the customer never screwed you over ever , unless buying from you in 98 and not agian falls into that class. Yet you told him to go jump when he , within his rights and within his mandate to minimise costs, made an enquiry. It would have cost you nothing to be polite and gained you everything.
I quote and do samples and attend to all customers , not everyone buys the product from me but I would never dream of telling them to FOAD if they did find a similar product cheaper. Thats what Im in business for , to serve the customer and by merely serving them does not mean they are obliged to purchase from me , I win some , I lose some. Thats business!!
Rodney Gold
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Poor show - Rodney Gold 05:08:00 02/15/07 (9)
- By the same token, only a limited range of facts - Bruce Kendall 08:31:00 02/15/07 (5)
- No. In the absence of further evidence, you -- a dealer -- are *choosing* to.... - Rick W 09:36:47 02/15/07 (4)
- You hit the nail on the head - Presto 11:00:57 02/15/07 (0)
- I didn't side with anyone. - Bruce Kendall 10:18:58 02/15/07 (1)
- It doesn't ring true with me either. See if you agree with this pithy remark: - clarkjohnsen 13:55:55 02/15/07 (0)
- Well said. nt - markrohr 09:51:38 02/15/07 (0)
- A classy replym, thanks Rodney - KKC 06:57:31 02/15/07 (2)
- Re: A classy replym, thanks Rodney - clio09 09:21:37 02/15/07 (1)
- Hah! - KKC 10:35:49 02/15/07 (0)