In Reply to: I agree... posted by Wellfed on February 10, 2007 at 08:33:22:
...these topics seem to me more suited to a general board, than to one supposedly devoted to tech topics.As for conversations being devoted to "true merit of a product", rotsa ruck around here!
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Many people don't seem to have the ability to discuss them in a constructive manner." No kidding! However... - clarkjohnsen 10:24:48 02/10/07 (16)
- "true merit of a product" - BS64 11:46:29 02/10/07 (6)
- "The only product offered by GK that might possess such a quality..." And you've tried them all? nt - clarkjohnsen 11:54:12 02/10/07 (5)
- no need - BS64 09:18:22 02/11/07 (4)
- Re: Prove it - geoffkait 10:35:16 02/11/07 (3)
- Re: Prove it - BS64 11:45:42 02/11/07 (2)
- Re: Never up, - geoffkait 12:28:50 02/11/07 (1)
- "~ Have a Nice Day" - BS64 13:05:56 02/11/07 (0)
- I realize that... - Wellfed 10:49:59 02/10/07 (8)
- Agreed. Now we're two... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:52:15 02/10/07 (7)
- I should add... - Wellfed 13:46:52 02/10/07 (6)
- Ja! Ve muss not allow polarizet treads hier, or tussles. Vhy kant ve all agree? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:33:44 02/11/07 (3)
- I'm sure many simply don't care to be around all the noisy hubris... - Wellfed 15:03:15 02/11/07 (2)
- Then they should know where they can go... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:55:52 02/12/07 (1)
- Oh behave... - Wellfed 14:07:17 02/12/07 (0)
- Further . . . - markrohr 07:55:31 02/11/07 (1)
- Absolutely, the threads should be allowed to continue. [nt] - Wellfed 09:57:52 02/11/07 (0)