|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: Re: too broad a brush posted by Bob Neill on August 7, 2006 at 15:59:18:
The end result in storing an analog signal digitally is the original analog signal. Digital is just a means to an end. Is is perfect? Of course not, nothing is.Here is my problem with your theory. I don't actually know what "crispness" is. I can imagine my own idea of crispness, and I can say categorically that I do not find all digial audio to be crisp. I've said before, quite possibly the best, most realistic sound I have ever heard from any audio was Ray Kimber's isomike demo at HE06. This was digital, DSD from his own hard drive into 6 EMM DACs. If crispness is supposed to denote something unnatural, this was not crisp.
This is what I mean by a broad brush.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: too broad a brush - tunenut 18:23:41 08/07/06 (1)
- Re: too broad a brush - Bob Neill 18:34:00 08/07/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]