In Reply to: Re: Agreement and disagreement posted by David Aiken on March 4, 2006 at 00:51:09:
"but we normally don't have the artists tell us what they intended us to hear"But we do have the artists art in the form that they agreed was what they wanted to express to us (CD's, DVD's). Do we not owe it to the artist NOT to reinterprete their art by manipulating it simply because we find it personally more satisfying. That's like recoloring Picasso's Blue Period, because we don't like blue.
To me this whole discussion gets lost the moment one implies "preference" or the like. Thats because there is no and can never be an answer to "preference" in "reproduction". There can only be "preference" when responding to the art, and reproduction is not the art. It may be an art in achiveing it, but it, in and of itself, is not the art or even part of it.
I am very careful in all my work NOT to imply "preference" in our testing, only "perception". We can perceive reproduction differences without ever implying or judging a preference. When there is no "perceptable" difference between the reproduction and the art, then, as an audio designer, my job is done, and the "preference" judgement can be made solely where it belongs - of the art and not the playback system.
If this is "boring" to you, then you and I are seeking different things.
I know that many will take strong exception to this point of view, but believe me, it was not arrived at lightely. I am a passionate listener who over the 45+ years of listening and designing has come to recognize what the importance aspects are. I attempt to describe them here and through my work.
Earl Geddes
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - EGeddes 21:30:50 03/05/06 (9)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - David Aiken 00:38:19 03/06/06 (8)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - EGeddes 05:24:42 03/06/06 (7)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - David Aiken 12:58:07 03/06/06 (6)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - EGeddes 15:22:34 03/06/06 (5)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - David Aiken 22:04:14 03/06/06 (4)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - EGeddes 06:04:29 03/07/06 (3)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - David Aiken 15:28:23 03/07/06 (2)
- Re: Agreement and disagreement - EGeddes 19:22:40 03/07/06 (1)
- My example is not false… - David Aiken 20:32:16 03/07/06 (0)