Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A Graphical Explanation involving Sampling - jj 09:25:41 02/17/00 (43)

• Re: A Graphical Explanation involving Sampling - Rod M 19:33:54 02/17/00 (20)
• RodM. . . - patentguy 08:11:23 02/18/00 (19)
• Re: RodM. . . - Rod M 13:50:12 02/18/00 (15)
• Re: RodM. . . - Mart 09:43:02 02/19/00 (14)
• You mean, "it can" - jj 14:04:41 02/19/00 (13)
• Re: You mean, "it can" - Mart 14:08:05 02/19/00 (12)
• There's no such THING, Mart. That's where you err. - jj 14:18:54 02/19/00 (11)
• so by infinite duration - Mart 14:35:10 02/19/00 (10)
• The example is not recursive... - jj 14:42:47 02/19/00 (9)
• care to design one? - Mart 14:56:17 02/19/00 (8)
• Design what? - jj 15:55:09 02/19/00 (7)
• Re: Design what? - Mart 18:39:24 02/19/00 (6)
• Ahhh.... - jj 19:35:44 02/19/00 (5)
• who doesn't cheap out? - Mart 22:42:19 02/19/00 (4)
• Sorry, I never name specific equipment - jj 10:10:14 02/20/00 (3)
• Re: Sorry, I never name specific equipment - Mart 18:34:57 02/20/00 (2)
• Hmm.... - jj 19:39:17 02/20/00 (1)
• very true... - Mart 20:46:42 02/20/00 (0)
• in all modesty - petew 10:44:17 02/18/00 (1)
• Thank you for sharing (nt) - jj 11:35:33 02/18/00 (0)
• I wouldn't feel bad about this... - jj 09:38:46 02/18/00 (0)
• Phase Preservation. - jj 13:08:43 02/17/00 (0)
• Great info, jj! - Spike 10:15:10 02/17/00 (0)
• Re: A Graphical Explaination involving Sampling - Werner 09:53:29 02/17/00 (19)
• Interesting idea, that. - jj 09:56:24 02/17/00 (18)
• I've never got around to learning MatLab ... - Mart 21:33:31 02/17/00 (17)
• That presents a bit of a problem. - jj 11:27:42 02/18/00 (9)
• now I know how a hamster feels ... - Mart 11:55:32 02/18/00 (8)
• Well, the point is... - jj 12:57:52 02/18/00 (7)
• Well, the REAL point is... - Mart 09:10:37 02/19/00 (6)
• No, it doesn't migrate down to audible frequencies - jj 14:06:49 02/19/00 (5)
• Re: No, it doesn't migrate down to audible frequencies - Mart 14:20:15 02/19/00 (4)
• Please see above... You're making some odd assumptions - jj 14:35:16 02/19/00 (3)
• oops, typo ... analogy -> use an analog - Mart 14:52:53 02/19/00 (2)
• Ah, now at least that comment computes :-) - jj 15:59:21 02/19/00 (1)
• Re: Ah, now at least that comment computes :-) - Mart 18:29:42 02/19/00 (0)
• oversampling - Werner 23:32:11 02/17/00 (6)
• Re: oversampling - Mart 00:52:51 02/18/00 (5)
• Re: oversampling - Werner 01:42:01 02/18/00 (4)
• Re: oversampling - JoeII-K 11:49:09 02/18/00 (2)
• care to expound on pros & cons of upsampling? - Mart 09:28:57 02/19/00 (1)
• Re: care to expound on pros & cons of upsampling? - JoeII-K 12:24:36 02/19/00 (0)
• I'm sorry I took too much for granted - Mart 04:58:04 02/18/00 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: A Graphical Explanation involving Sampling - Rod M 19:33:54 02/17/00 (20)
• RodM. . . - patentguy 08:11:23 02/18/00 (19)
• Re: RodM. . . - Rod M 13:50:12 02/18/00 (15)
• Re: RodM. . . - Mart 09:43:02 02/19/00 (14)
• You mean, "it can" - jj 14:04:41 02/19/00 (13)
• Re: You mean, "it can" - Mart 14:08:05 02/19/00 (12)
• There's no such THING, Mart. That's where you err. - jj 14:18:54 02/19/00 (11)
• so by infinite duration - Mart 14:35:10 02/19/00 (10)
• The example is not recursive... - jj 14:42:47 02/19/00 (9)
• care to design one? - Mart 14:56:17 02/19/00 (8)
• Design what? - jj 15:55:09 02/19/00 (7)
• Re: Design what? - Mart 18:39:24 02/19/00 (6)
• Ahhh.... - jj 19:35:44 02/19/00 (5)
• who doesn't cheap out? - Mart 22:42:19 02/19/00 (4)
• Sorry, I never name specific equipment - jj 10:10:14 02/20/00 (3)
• Re: Sorry, I never name specific equipment - Mart 18:34:57 02/20/00 (2)
• Hmm.... - jj 19:39:17 02/20/00 (1)
• very true... - Mart 20:46:42 02/20/00 (0)
• in all modesty - petew 10:44:17 02/18/00 (1)
• Thank you for sharing (nt) - jj 11:35:33 02/18/00 (0)
• I wouldn't feel bad about this... - jj 09:38:46 02/18/00 (0)