In Reply to: Re: A Graphical Explaination involving Sampling posted by Werner on February 17, 2000 at 09:53:29:
A bit more complicated, but that's a good idea.You guys need more Matlab licenses :_)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Interesting idea, that. - jj 09:56:24 02/17/00 (18)
- I've never got around to learning MatLab ... - Mart 21:33:31 02/17/00 (17)
- That presents a bit of a problem. - jj 11:27:42 02/18/00 (9)
- now I know how a hamster feels ... - Mart 11:55:32 02/18/00 (8)
- Well, the point is... - jj 12:57:52 02/18/00 (7)
- Well, the REAL point is... - Mart 09:10:37 02/19/00 (6)
- No, it doesn't migrate down to audible frequencies - jj 14:06:49 02/19/00 (5)
- Re: No, it doesn't migrate down to audible frequencies - Mart 14:20:15 02/19/00 (4)
- Please see above... You're making some odd assumptions - jj 14:35:16 02/19/00 (3)
- oops, typo ... analogy -> use an analog - Mart 14:52:53 02/19/00 (2)
- Ah, now at least that comment computes :-) - jj 15:59:21 02/19/00 (1)
- Re: Ah, now at least that comment computes :-) - Mart 18:29:42 02/19/00 (0)
- oversampling - Werner 23:32:11 02/17/00 (6)
- Re: oversampling - Mart 00:52:51 02/18/00 (5)
- Re: oversampling - Werner 01:42:01 02/18/00 (4)
- Re: oversampling - JoeII-K 11:49:09 02/18/00 (2)
- care to expound on pros & cons of upsampling? - Mart 09:28:57 02/19/00 (1)
- Re: care to expound on pros & cons of upsampling? - JoeII-K 12:24:36 02/19/00 (0)
- I'm sorry I took too much for granted - Mart 04:58:04 02/18/00 (0)